Re: Savanna = outdated rubbish (data contradicts comparative imagination




Op 09-07-2007 02:39, in artikel
1183941585.264746.101170@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee Olsen
<paleocity@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:

On Jul 8, 1:22 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Op 08-07-2007 15:13, in artikel
1183900411.572945.179...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee Olsen
<paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:





On Jul 7, 11:48 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Op 08-07-2007 01:47, in artikel
1183852063.533488.158...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee Olsen
<paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:

On Jul 7, 3:36 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Op 07-07-2007 19:05, in artikel
1183827948.979855.282...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee Olsen
<paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:

On Jul 7, 8:18 am, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

;) ;) ;)

His level of debate.

Your level, forgot?

Message-ID: <1124565262.379006.215...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Jason Eshleman

The usual blabla of this obscure PA.
Just listen what "real"PAs have to tell:


PV Tobias 1998
"Water and human evolution"
Out There 3:38-44http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~mvaneech/outthere.htm

By 1995, when I gave the Daryll Forde Memorial Lecture at University
College, London, I stated of the SH, "We were all profoundly and
unutterably
wrong! ... All the former savannah supporters (including myself) must now
swallow our earlier words in the light of the new results from the early
hominid deposits..."

Humans are not savannah-adapted animals - In rejecting the SH, I was moved
primarily by the evidence unearthed in S.& E.Africa. Meanwhile, Elaine
Morgan had been piecing together a nr of other arguments against the SH,
based on some anat., biochem.& physiol.data of modern humans, much of which
was collected by Belgium's Dr Marc Verhaegen, which contrast sharply with
the traits in present-day animals that are truly adapted to savannah life.

Liar, Tobias didn't say anything like that.

:-D
You're crazy.
Ask Tobias, you fool.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is Oreopithicus the Aquatic Ape Link?
    ... /bonobos come within a kilometre of a stream of water, ... > water acted as an agency of selection in human evolution more than it ... You chose the term 'aquatic phase', ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: A critique of the Mess Algis is in and Cant get out of
    ... >>> with you on one or two tiny aspects (shock horror, water influenced ... >>> our evolution more than it did chimps) of human evolution. ... Has any AAH proponent ever suggested anyone should leave any newsgroup? ... believe it's not your grand children writing these posts. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: MV is the most published author of SAP
    ... The idea that water has acted as an agency of selection in ... human evolution more than it has in chimp" as if this is what people are ... The problem with your general statement ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Savanna = outdated rubbish (data contradicts comparative imagination
    ... "Verhaegen's reasoning was considered as ... "Water and human evolution" ... All the former savannah supporters must now ... Not as crazy as you. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Tobias 1995
    ... It's only astonishing to someone whose interests in human evolution ... My interests include the concept that moving through water could have ... What evidence is there for any selection in human evolution at all? ... "my" side of the fence just as vehemently as i have with you guys. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)