Re: Bipedal P & G
- From: Marc Verhaegen <m_verhaegen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:46:20 +0200
Op 09-07-2007 03:10, in artikel
1183943434.474767.13890@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee Olsen
<paleocity@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:
On Jul 8, 1:31 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Op 08-07-2007 14:03, in artikel
1183896198.950171.213...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee Olsen
<paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:
On Jul 7, 11:19 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Op 08-07-2007 01:32, in artikel
1183851175.520444.139...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee Olsen
<paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:
On Jul 7, 3:35 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Op 07-07-2007 17:35, in artikel
1183822556.516813.114...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee Olsen
<paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:
On Jul 7, 8:15 am, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Op 07-07-2007 14:48, in artikel
1183812481.442630.245...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee Olsen
<paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:
On Jul 6, 11:33 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Why not inform a bit, eg, my 2002 paper with P-F.Puech & S.Munro
"Aquarboreal ancestors?" Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17:212-7.
Just
google "aquarboreal". :-)
:-)
Yes, if you want endless question marks and silly information on how
mountain beavers are semi-aquatic animals, by all means see TREE 2002.
Said the SF whose ancestors ran after antelopes.
The savanna freaks have the hard evidence....cut marks on antelope
bones = savanna living niche.
Yes, on riverbanks, forgot??
Funny you can't cite this....you made it up. Getting pretty desperate
aren't you?
??
Like this one?
"Spatially associated zooarchaeological remains show that hominids
acquired meat and mar-
row by 2.5 million years ago and that they are the near contemporary
of
Oldowan artifacts at nearby Gona. The combined evidence suggests that
be-
havioral changes associated with lithic technology and enhanced
carnivory may
have been coincident with the emergence of the Homo clade from
Australo-
pithecus afarensis in eastern Africa."
Jean de Heinzelin, et al. SCIENCE VOL 284 23 APRIL 1999
Yes, inland Homo along the rivers had to get the little bit of bone marrow
they found in drowned antelopes to get enough poly-unsat.fatty acids
(esp.DHA): at the coast, where they had learnt to use stone tools to open
shells etc., they had plenty of these brain-specific FAs in seafoods (the
reason why they got large brains). This again proves that we are basically
littoral animals & no savanna animals at all, of course, although a very few
remote human populations now live in savannas. Thanks a lot for the
argument. All this is clearly explained in the works of Michael Crawford,
Stephen Cunnane, Leigh Boradhurst etc. Just google.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bipedal P & G
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: Bipedal P & G
- References:
- Re: Bipedal P & G
- From: Rich Travsky
- Re: Bipedal P & G
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Bipedal P & G
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: Bipedal P & G
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Bipedal P & G
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: Bipedal P & G
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Bipedal P & G
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: Bipedal P & G
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Bipedal P & G
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: Bipedal P & G
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Bipedal P & G
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: Bipedal P & G
- Prev by Date: Re: Savanna = outdated rubbish (data contradicts comparative imagination
- Next by Date: Savanna believers run after kudus (Re: AAT all washed up (WARNING: graphic photo)
- Previous by thread: Re: Bipedal P & G
- Next by thread: Re: Bipedal P & G
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|