Re: New Research Confirms 'Out Of Africa' Theory Of HumanEvolution

On Jul 9, 3:49 am, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Op 09-07-2007 03:00, in artikel
1183942845.172535.220...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee Olsen
<paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:





On Jul 8, 1:30 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Op 08-07-2007 14:30, in artikel
1183897850.960366.246...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee Olsen
<paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:

The child lay amid marine & freshwater shellfish.

1936 citation I presume?? Or did you just make it up?

Inform before opening your Big Mouth No Content.

No answer , so you still don't have a citation...just made it up, just
like imaginary oysters.

My little boy, inform or shut up.

You are really stupid enough to believe a secondary source? Cite where
Tobias wrote such a thing himself.

Do your own homework, my little boy: why should I care whether some obscure
imbecile believes this or not??
If you don't even know this, why not shut your Big Mouth?
Bah! Disgusting fool.

Doughboy, you lied about that just as you lied about this:

Message ID: 42e54fa7$0$6141$ba620...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
MV squawks: Biases like: "1.8-Ma Homo remains come from Algeria, Iran,
Kenya, Georgia, Java... always near lakes or seas (R.Dennell 2003 JHE
45:421);..."

LO: "This erroneous piece of information you believe from Dennell (or
did you mis-quote Dennell-I see no quotation marks here, maybe you
ought recheck to see if he actually said that), ...."

I checked that today, doughboy and Dennell said no such thing or
anything like it, either on page 421 or anywhere else. Either you lied
or you can't read.

Ask Dennell, my boy, & shut up.
Oxbow lake.


Liar, you are making that up. Doughboy has to lie to make an argument.
You stupid idiot, "Oxbow lake" doesn't mean AWAYS found near
lakes.... You deliberately tried to deceive people into thinking that
Dennell 2003 was suggesting "always" found near lakes or seas. You are
a fraud, just as Jason claimed.

Message-ID: <1124421294.671438.286120@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Lee Olsen did a rather good job of pointing out the holes to you
within
the last couple of weeks. Your response was to duck and claim that
your "theory" wasn't about fossils. IOW (as you're so fond of saying)
you've got a "theory" that exists only by ignoring contradictory
evidence and doesn't actually explain anything. You're argumentative
style is to set up a strawman, claiming that the "alternative" is the
"savanna" as if that somehow has meaning. It doesn't. You're a
nutcase, a delusional fool who passes off his correspondence to
Nature
like it was a peer reviewed article, who passes off his TREE article
like it was original research and not an opinion piece, and who
pretends that he's got stratocladistic support for things for which
he
does not. You're a fraud, and on top of that, you're an ***."

.

Quantcast