Re: New Research Confirms 'Out Of Africa' Theory Of HumanEvolution
- From: Marc Verhaegen <m_verhaegen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:09:03 +0200
Op 11-07-2007 01:08, in artikel
1184108924.212897.172770@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee Olsen
<paleocity@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:
On Jul 6, 11:27 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Op 07-07-2007 07:10, in artikel 468F2059.EA699...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Rich
Travsky <traRvE...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:
...
Mojokerto = marine.
Partly, of course: found amid marine & freshwater molluscs.
Gona.
Too stupid to see the distinction between a fossil & tools?
Gona has *both*. IN association with each other. You knew that, right?
No, I didn't know Gona had *Homo*fossils.
Well, you know it now doughboy (estimated between 1.5-1.0 Ma. Semaw
2001).
Tell me something Marc, have you ever owned a library card?
Yes, my little boy, the Homo fossils are not 2.5 Ma.
Mojokerto is older.
Got it?
Mojokerto = delta, not savanna as some fools claim.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: New Research Confirms 'Out Of Africa' Theory Of HumanEvolution
- From: Rich Travsky
- Re: New Research Confirms 'Out Of Africa' Theory Of HumanEvolution
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: New Research Confirms 'Out Of Africa' Theory Of HumanEvolution
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: New Research Confirms 'Out Of Africa' Theory Of HumanEvolution
- Prev by Date: Re: Bipedal P & G
- Next by Date: Re: Kudu runner (Re: AAT all washed up (WARNING: graphic photo)
- Previous by thread: Re: New Research Confirms 'Out Of Africa' Theory Of HumanEvolution
- Next by thread: Re: New Research Confirms 'Out Of Africa' Theory Of HumanEvolution
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|