Re: Marc was right
- From: Lee Olsen <paleocity@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 07:30:08 -0700
On Jul 12, 5:50 am, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Op 11-07-2007 22:02, in artikel
1184184145.227822.74...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee Olsen
<paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:
On Jul 11, 12:02 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Op 10-07-2007 23:03, in artikel
1184101427.263967.154...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee Olsen
<paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:
Prof.Tobiashttp://allserv.rug.ac.be/~mvaneech/outthere.htm
³? if ever our earliest ancestors were savannah dwellers, we must have been
the worst, the most profligate urinators there²
Here is a photo of a most profligate urinator on the savanna, a deadMy little boy, kudus don't urinate much: they're savanna mammals, didn't
kudu.
you
know??
Still no answer.
Oh, did you miss it, want to see it again?
Here is a photo of a most profligate urinator on the savanna, a dead
kudu.
http://www.naturalhistorymag.com/master.html?http://www.naturalhistor...
1206/1206_samplings.html
kudus don't urinate much: they're savanna mammals, didn't you
know?? It's humans who are profligate urinators, forgot?
Did you forget?
"Looks like the kudu could use a little more SC fat and better
kidneys
in order to get away from Mr. Karoha."
Homo is better adapted to the heat than the dead kudu or the kudu
wouldn't be dead. Is that clear enough now?
Homo is better adapted to the savanna than this wet aper or he
wouldn't be dead:
http://www.biarms.com/PhotoAlbums/sharkATTACK1.jpg- Hide quoted text -
As I said: still no answer.
No, the answer seems too complicated for you to understand. What part
of "dead kudu" are you having trouble with? Mr. Karoha is obviously
better adapted to the savanna than the kudu or the kudu wouldn't be
dead. Abstract imaginary problems that couch potatoes like you can
think up really are not proof of anything except stupidity. No fur, no
SC fat, no 4 legs, too bad Mr. Kudu.....
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Marc was right
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Marc was right
- References:
- Re: Marc was right?
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: Marc was right?
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Marc was right?
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: Marc was right?
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Marc was right?
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: Marc was right
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Marc was right
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: Marc was right
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Marc was right
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: Marc was right
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Marc was right
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: Marc was right
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Marc was right
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: Marc was right
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Marc was right
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: Marc was right
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Marc was right
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: Marc was right
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Marc was right?
- Prev by Date: Re: Eritrean stone tools push back dates of earliest use of marine resources
- Next by Date: Re: New Hominid Fossil Finds In Ethiopia, 3.5-3.8 mya
- Previous by thread: Re: Marc was right
- Next by thread: Re: Marc was right
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|