Re: More trouble for dry apers (Re: Ealine Morgan

On Aug 1, 1:19 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Op 01-08-2007 20:11, in artikel
1185991888.737225.242...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee Olsen
<paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:

Gona = butchering at riverbanks confirms AAT, just like whale butchering
does: M.Gutierrez cs.2001 "Exploitation d¹un grand cétacé au Paléolithique
ancien: le site de Dungo V à Baia Farta (Benguela, Angola)" CRAS
332:357-362: ... skeleton of a large whale Balaenoptera was found closely
associated with 57 paleolithic artefacts near Baia Farta ...
Too late, Homo evolving on the savanna, at Gona, over a million years
before this isolated find was made.
My little boy, H & P split 5 Ma, more than 2 My before Gona.

No answer, of course, only this nonsense:

Says the idiot who thinks mountain beavers are semi-aquatic.


You bet doughboy, all the sooner for Homo ancestors to get out on the
savanna.

??
Savanna?? What has savanna to do with all this??

Littoral?? What does littoral have to do with all this?

My little boy, only a few
obsolete Savanna Fanatics still believe our ancestors were savanna dwellers
once.

Gona 2.6 mya = savanna ostrich + savanna tortoise (For the illiterate
AATers, not to be confused with water turtles)
+ cut-marked savanna antelope bones = Homo living on the savanna.

Message-ID: <1124421294.671438.286120@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Lee Olsen did a rather good job of pointing out the holes to you
within
the last couple of weeks. Your response was to duck and claim that
your "theory" wasn't about fossils. IOW (as you're so fond of saying)
you've got a "theory" that exists only by ignoring contradictory
evidence and doesn't actually explain anything. You're argumentative
style is to set up a strawman, claiming that the "alternative" is the
"savanna" as if that somehow has meaning. It doesn't. You're a
nutcase, a delusional fool who passes off his correspondence to
Nature
like it was a peer reviewed article, who passes off his TREE article
like it was original research and not an opinion piece, and who
pretends that he's got stratocladistic support for things for which
he
does not. You're a fraud, and on top of that, you're an ***."

Lies and misinformation = early coconuts + algae + shelled sea foods
early + semi-aquatic mountain beavers.

Listen to what sensible people, already 20 years ago, had to say on
the subject:

Nature 325:305-306, 1987
Origin of hominid bipedalism

Hominid???? Who cares about that, you don't:

Message-ID: <430778e6$0$6564$ba620e4c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Marc Verhaegin says: "AAT is about Homo, *not* about hominids in
general."

Savanna Hypothesis is about how Homo's endurant bipedalism evolved and
how it is Mr. Karoha can
catch a kudu.

http://www.naturalhistorymag.com/master.html?http://www.naturalhistorymag.com/1206/1206_samplings.html

Think Lucy could catch a kudu with her pot belly and curved toes? No?
Didn't think so.

.

Quantcast