The comparative data train wreck (was Re: human ancestors never passed through a knuckle-walking phase

Message-ID: <1124058632.360214.177290@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Jason Eshleman: "You are asking for someone to contradict something
that you've not made a case for. You are asking someone to prove a
negative. This isn't science, though I suspect you don't know what
science is and as such will continue your mentally ill diatribes."


On Aug 16, 3:11 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Apparently still unable to give 1 counter-argument against our comparative
data.

_____

Op 16-08-2007 16:20, in artikel
1187274033.060809.59...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee Olsen
<paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:



On Aug 14, 1:55 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<snip>

- They *believe* (without evidence) that these features had been present &
were for some reason disappearing in our ancestry.

ROFL
Message-ID: <42cec844$0$6536$ba620...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Marc: "AAT says that some time after Homo & Pan split, our ancestors
were seaside omnivores
who collected coconuts, fruits, turtles, bird eggs, shell-, crayfish,
algae etc."

Marc is accusing Richmond & Strait "without evidence"???? The
irony ....

<snip>- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


.

Relevant Pages