Re: Bravo, Mr. Crowley! (was 'Ghost in his own hamlet')

In article <xWdyi.21644$j7.397...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Paul Crowley" <slkwuoiutiuytciu...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I sometimes think of responding to Greg,
but his posts leave me dumbstruck. The
brilliance of their logic and the power of
their reasoning are both in a class of their
own.
There is nothing that I (or anyone) could
possibly say.


Mr. Crowley,
I must tell you how impressed I am concerning your
behaviour in this newsgroup. Your indomitable defense of the
mighty Earl is to be commended, and your forthright and
insightful replies to this rabble are an honor to Oxfordians
everywhere, and this is especially impressive when, truth
be told, your interlocutors have no more insight than a rancid
can of the Strat-man's ass butter. How COULD that reechy
ragamuffin POSSIBLY have written our glorious "Richard II"? A
man who could shuffle from deer park to midden heap but who
could hardly pen a polka, much less "Coriolanus?" Shall we
derive our history from the recta of university professors?
Think for yourselves, fellow thespians! The queen's favorite,
the darling of Lord Cecil and Arthur Golding, that nexus
of light: Edward DeVere, Earl of Oxford! MUST have been
the true playwright! He stands now on the ultimate step
of the pedestal of history, ready to be crowned Author!
Author! Author! Stand for your own, Mr. Crowley! Unwind
your bloody flag!
AHN

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups
other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org
for abuse and hashcash info.

.