Re: Human family tree is a tangled, messy bush

On Sep 2, 1:29 am, "J.LyonLayden" <JosephLay...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And do you think that those skeptics on usenet who ridiculed posters
who believed in "little people" before the finding of Homo Flores have
gone back and apologized to the ones they offended? Will those who
ridicule belief in giants go back and apologize after we finally dig
up a complete meganthropus skeleton?

They do not want to learn anything. All they care about is to find
more evidence supporting their pre-conceived notions.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Human family tree is a tangled, messy bush
    ... we want brain size to increase in lock step with tool use, ... ridicule belief in giants go back and apologize after we finally dig ... and agriculture a couple more thousand years and "discover" that the ... It's amazing to me how people still ridicule the belief in "lost ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • RE: Fwd: NUCULAR fielded text searchable indexing
    ... Anyway, I apologize for my attempt at humor, since it appears ... If I find the software useful, ... In the case of "nucular", it's a mispronunciation that has been widely ... associate it as an object of ridicule that it's an immediate turn-off. ...
    (comp.lang.python)