Re: diving H, non-diving P (Re: Ealine Morgan

Marc Verhaegen wrote:

Olson, are you really too stupid to understand that when a forest animal
moves to the savanna, it becomes less dependent on water?? That is what we
see in all savanna mammals. Humans are the opposite. IOW, all the blabla
(incl.the just-so opinions of savanna believers ("may, almost certainly, we
think, may have been, probably" etc.)) you produce below is irrelevant.

Keep running afer your kudu, my boy.


http://groups.google.com/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/msg/a8f7ca1c31d823b0?dmode=source&hl=en
...
From: "Marc Verhaegen" <fa204...@xxxxxxxxx>
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
...
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 18:40:26 +0200
...
"Rich Travsky" <traRvs...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3E90F371.6150539@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
...
Your arborealism can't explain our ext.nose, our furlessness, SC fat etc.

Neither can you. Especially since you admitted bushmen are savannah adapted.

"admitted"?? :-D What else IYO??
Yes, you admitted it. Are you denying it now?

Of course they're savanna adapted!! What else IYO??
...



http://groups.google.com/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/msg/1ea478ea599c5540?dmode=source&hl=en
...
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003

"Rich Travsky" <traRvs...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

Humans are no long-distance species.
Interesting what can be seen on the Discovery TV Channel. I saw a TV
episode about a nice little African bushman. He was running down some sort
of gazelle or antelope (apparently a perfectly healthy example). He just
kept running after the poor (4-legged) beast and he just kept running and
running and running. After about four hours of running in the mid-day sun,
he was able to simply walk up and toss a spear into the poor exhausted
beast. I presume that he then spent the rest of the day butchering it and
carrying it back. The bushman didn't seem to be the slightest bit fazed
by the whole process. All in a day's work for him I suppose.
...
Yes, very interesting, but it's about Bushmen, recently (after the
sapiens LCA) savanna-adapted humans, not about the majority of human beings.
You

RECENTLY SAVANNA ADAPTED HUMANS???

WHY DO YOU SHOUT?? CAN'T YOU READ??

So, humans CAN adapt to the savanna?

Why not IYO??

And for good measure, you admitted the LCA could have been savanna adapted too:



http://groups.google.com/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/msg/3ab1d3f594121ccc?dmode=source

From: "Marc Verhaegen" <fa204...@xxxxxxxxx>
...
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 19:50:24 +0200
...
"Rich Travsky" <traRvs...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
...
Then if bushmen can adapt to the savannah, then so could eskimos in time.
Yes, why not?? As well as Bushmen can adapt to the poles.
And if bushmen can be savanna adapted, why not the LCA?

Could, I wouldn't know. Point is: they didn't.
...
.

Relevant Pages