Re: Lucy = slow

"Paul Crowley" <slkwuoiutiuytciuyik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dBCWi.22964$j7.433759@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"mclark" <mbclark55@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1193963953.752103.98290@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

They were (according to you) dominant
over every other species. How else were
they to expand their numbers
What was to stop them?

1). Show me the message ID

I am not, of course, saying that YOU
personally ever said anything. Such
an idea would be quite absurd. You
are so mindless, and so incapable of
thought, or of reaching any kind of
conclusion that you would not dare to
assert that 1 + 1 = 2. I was using 'you'
in the general sense of "you lot" or
of "standard PA".

So you don't have an ID. I'm flattered that you
would include me in this "you lot" of yours. That
only means that I've managed to annoy you to
the same extent as all those nasty PA's.

2). Who said anything about expanding their
numbers?

See above.

So do you have a citation from some member of
that "you lot" group? Remember, you were asking
why Africa didn't produce hominid populations in
the billions 3 million years ago and why "standard PA"
doesn't seem to be able to provide a reasonable
explanation for this mystery.

Well?

You have a species with NO constraints
imposed upon it -- except for what it
chooses to do.

Who said "..a species with NO constraints imposed
upon it"?

See above.

Well? I looked above and I couldn't see anyone saying
anything about "NO constraints" except you.

Yes, you are putting forth this absurdity. I haven't
said a damned thing other than your numbers (yes,
Y O U R numbers, Pauly) stink of pure ignorance.

Naturally.

Finally --some recognition of the fact that your problems
can be laid at the feet of the mother who bore you.

Paul.

--
"If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end in doubts; but if
he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties."
-- Sir Francis Bacon


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: To the real anthropologists (you know who you are)
    ... No one can, by themselves, be "another species." ... and blah blah blah - and that's ALL ... I know exactly what you are saying. ... What was the relevance of your posting rubbish about the appearance of your ...
    (sci.anthropology)
  • Re: To the real anthropologists (you know who you are)
    ... you are, how you are another species, and blah blah blah - and that's ALL ... You are an ego projector par excellance. ... Are you saying that humans could have invented the wheel ... "knowledge" and bitching about how the religious folks are another species. ...
    (sci.anthropology)
  • Re: Atheists are the biggest fools on Earth
    ... then standards of good and evil are ... safeguard and advance our society. ... >> And, if there is no Supreme Being to present such a standard, then ... > individual orders, genera, and species are allowed to vary by no more ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
    ... It also appears to be a different level to the one Darwin ... Darwin was meaning and I am listening to what people say ... in what Darwin is saying. ... nowhere does he say that all species existed at the beginning! ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
    ... I was actually saying that maybe ... a person can't blame Darwin for it. ... Species, and instead we had first learned the idea of natural ... varieties, and that each species first existed as a variety, ...
    (talk.origins)