Re: 3 definitions of Hs
- From: Marc Verhaegen <m_verhaegen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 13:49:21 +0100
Op 04-11-2007 01:32, in artikel
1194136375.208440.53540@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, spiznet
<mark@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:
On Nov 3, 7:54 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Our netloon:
Op 03-11-2007 19:31, in artikel
1194114719.006219.248...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee Olsen
<paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:
On Nov 2, 11:18 am, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sigh.
H/P = 5 Ma has nothing to do with fossil ecidence, my boy.
Savanna believers are stupid stupid stupid.
Says the nut case that thinks mountain beavers are semi aquatic (TREE
2002).
Well, you won't respond to my comments
Liar, I've spent already too much time with prejudiced people like you, but
your intelligence is your own problem. For the Xth time: not difficult, but
you have to *read*:
When H & P split has to do with DNA of P & H, nothing with apiths.
Okidoki, my boy?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 3 definitions of Hs
- From: spiznet
- Re: 3 definitions of Hs
- References:
- Re: 3 definitions of Hs
- From: spiznet
- Re: 3 definitions of Hs
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: 3 definitions of Hs
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: 3 definitions of Hs
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: 3 definitions of Hs
- From: spiznet
- Re: 3 definitions of Hs
- Prev by Date: Re: kuduburgers to go
- Next by Date: Re: kuduburgers to go
- Previous by thread: Re: 3 definitions of Hs
- Next by thread: Re: 3 definitions of Hs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
