Re: Homo Erectus was *not* a hunter/runner.


"Claudius Denk" <claudiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:wS19j.80333$Um6.74976@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Makouli" <men@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jYidnUy7D4iYXv7anZ2dnUVZ_uKpnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Claudius Denk" <claudiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:YmK8j.80259$Um6.35206@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Thy Bone" <"ofan ass"@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:47635AAC.5112E0A6@xxxxxxxxxxxx

[...]

Long distance yes. Fast (relatively) No. And we are lousy swimmers
compared to
just about anything else than floats
with effort - turtles float without any effort. Hmmmm. Thimk agin.

[hogwash]

Tell me, do you think early hominids regularly outran lion-like
predators? Bear sized hyena?

Tell me, Dimmy, how long has it been since you beat your wife?

The reason you only discuss AAT is because it draws attention away from
the vacuousness of conventional theory. You window lickers as suppose to
be explaining the selective origins of the most social mammal in
existence. Instead we get dimwitted notions about long distance walking.
It should be obvious to you that communal creatures can only result from
communal selection. Yet you idiots have them maintaining a
hunting/gathering lifestyle no different than chimpanzees!

[Yawn] Does this mean that you won't be answering the question?

1. You would have to know something about "conventional theory" before
you could pass such a judgement (vacuous). You don't.

2. Those "window lickers" are obligated *by you* to do what --exactly?
Hold your hand through some ~really~ elementary discovery? Applaud
your delusional rantings?

3 There is nothing "dimwitted" about long-distance walking. "Dimwitted"
would better describe your ham-handed response to these simple
observations (humans are great long-distance walkers).

4. What on Earth do you mean by "communal" and how does this term
alter conventional understandings of the social order? Will you treat
your audience to yet another of your famous bait-and-switch, feint-
and-dodge, oily evasions? (drum roll)

5. The "idiots" in this NG ~do not~ maintain that our hominid ancestors'
lifestyle was indistinguishable from a chimps'. Geez, wrong again.
You sure can pile 'em up.

6. The author of this cheap screed, http://tinyurl.com/8fomk , needs some
basic instruction in composition. We can work on the pureed bovine
excretement when this "gentleman" learns how to frame an argument.

7. Assuming you ~could~ get someone with bad teeth and low self-esteem
to exchange vows, I still need to know the date of its last thrashing.
IOW,
perhaps your original rubber-headed question really is
rubber-headed....?

"C'mon, you evasive twit, just answer the question."
--Dimmy, 12/06/2005



.

Quantcast