Re: Mikey addresses content
- From: claudiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:56:25 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 1, 7:41 am, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 1, 7:29 am, claudiusd...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Is it a secret?
Message-ID: <376ED09C.69A21...@xxxxxxxxxxx>#1/1
Niccolo Caldararo: " It is embarrassing to you (or should be) for you
to continually make
statements which most of us know are unsupported by the data."
Dan Barnes: "..a number of people have suggested that the best thing
you can do is do
substantial background reading, reframe your arguement and come back
again."
Greg Laden: "Read the stuff. If you have a vague memory
of it, that is not good enough." "Hit the books, kid!"
I can only imagine how frustrating it must be to be so sure you are
right and so completely unable to say how or why.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mikey addresses content
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: Mikey addresses content
- References:
- Re: Mikey addresses content
- From: rmacfarl
- Re: Mikey addresses content
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: Mikey addresses content
- Prev by Date: Re: Turnover Pulse Vagueness
- Next by Date: Re: Mikey addresses content
- Previous by thread: Re: Mikey addresses content
- Next by thread: Re: Mikey addresses content
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
