Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?

On Feb 10, 12:06 pm, "Makouli" <m...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
<claudiusd...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:754c646c-0442-4b02-a889-d47f5f7caa04@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 9, 5:36 pm, "Makouli" <m...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:





<claudiusd...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:f55f08cf-6978-45b7-bdf9-8424e7114a30@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 9, 12:18 pm, "Makouli" <m...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:> >
<claudiusd...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:b5dee1cd-c7c1-4f95-8f60-496ca35325ff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 7, 7:44 pm, "Makouli" <m...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

[...]

Now answer the questions I asked you in the first post on this thread,
you evasive twit.

What question was that, Dimmy?

Put up or shut up, jackass.

=============================
"By not stating anything explicitly nobody
can dispute it." Dimmy --01/17/08
You can't say you weren't given mutiple opportunities to respond.

Is this your newest form of evasion, Dim one?

==========================
"Typical evasiveness."
--Dimmy 12/24/2005

Just think, if you had a real hypothesis you wouldn't have to pretend
that you didn't see my questions.
.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast