Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?

<claudiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:c0172cbb-c431-4937-ba78-3130b1e327dd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[...]

Oh BTW, Dimmy, I don't think this qualifies as a
hypothesis:http://tinyurl.com/8fomk. Do you?
I think your "questions" qualify you as a complete
lunatic. Remember now, I'm laughing ~at~ you.

Maybe if you made the retraction you'd feel better about yourself and
you wouldn't feel the need to further misrepresent the state of your
knowledge.

Retract "what", Dimmy? And will you stop with all
that irony already? That .sig file is getting *huge*.

===============================
" Where's the hypothesis?
Where are the details?"
Dimmy --01/14/08


.

Relevant Pages
Loading