Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?

<claudiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:99d83bf1-8135-4ba2-a39f-c65d43f7870f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 11, 12:29 pm, "Makouli" <m...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
<claudiusd...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:0f772310-06a9-4dac-911a-a02255f817aa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 11, 8:19 am, "Makouli" <m...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]

You can't say I didn't provide you with an opportunity to redeem
yourself. (Given your track record I can see how that wouldn't be
that attractive anyways.)

Retract "what", Dimmy?
Just think. If there actually was a hypothesis for you conventional
theorists you wouldn't have to pretend you can't see my questions.

Retract "what", Dimmy?

============================
"I know evasiveness when I see it."
--Dimmy 12/02/2005

Your foot from your mouth.

Could you take some time out of your busy
schedule to show me just what you'd like
me to retract? Or are we gonna play this
little dodge game of yours until the cows
come home?
==============================
"To achieve scientific progress intellectual
honesty cannot be considered optional."
Dimmy --12/30/2002


.

Relevant Pages
Loading