Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?

<claudiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4ab9aa1a-b6d1-4201-b7be-0bc0135d9190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[...]

Could you take some time out of your busy
schedule to show me just what you'd like
me to retract? Or are we gonna play this
little dodge game of yours until the cows
come home?

If you now say that you dispute Lee's assertion that HE regularly
outran predators and ran-down kudu and antelope why did you not
dispute it before? And then there's the rather obvious observation
that humans cannot go far without access to fresh water. It never
even occurred to you that this was inconsistent with reality as we
know it. As long as it comes from the mouth of an anthropologists
you treat it as gospel--literally.

First of all, as Lee says elsewhere, such a thing was never
said. So how can I dispute or support something that exists
in your mind only? And what of the point that humans need
fresh water? And how is it supposed to ocurr to me "that this
was inconsistent with reality as we know it? How am I supposed
to parse such a combobulation of sentences? Sure, without fresh
water, and depending on the environment, humans are good for
about 2 days. I wouldn't call that an upward bound nor can I
resist pointing out that alot of wusses start complaining much
earlier than that but ~~so what ~~ ? Is there a point to this
wild goose chase?

So when you finally do get around to *substance* , we
discover that all that McGinnian posturing was just that.
Would you like me to say that I'm surprised?

I think it is becoming more and more obvious that the lack of
thought that comes from you is truly indicative of a lack of
understanding.

You're way out of your league here, Dimmy. Maybe you
should get into creative writing or some sort of poetry/
performance art....?

=======================================
"Why don't you look it up[?]"
Dimmy --12/29/07


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: God=G_uv BACK TO PHILOSOPHY
    ... Just because humans inherently contain psychological ... But reality is not a democracy - even if every single person on the ... We have long known what accounts for the existence of religion. ... > I certainly have made a historic discovery irregardless of whether ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: God=G_uv BACK TO PHILOSOPHY
    ... Just because humans inherently contain psychological ... But reality is not a democracy - even if every single person on the ... We have long known what accounts for the existence of religion. ... > I certainly have made a historic discovery irregardless of whether ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • The legend of other
    ... the robots of one time line meet the robots of another time ... This species though promising - seem quite ... different than humans imagine - but more different than humans CAN ... representing quantum reality. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Wild animals MUST be even more intelligent than humans
    ... I agree that most schooling is currently about out- ... with reality at all, ... ways of functioning and about the functioning of the social group! ... the wisdom of humans either but find a higher level of wisdom ...
    (rec.animals.wildlife)
  • Re: investigation, definitions & logic
    ... Let me address a few of the reasons why INFORMAL LOGIC is what we humans ... natural thing or process or dimension (or any other way "reality is ... consistencies of sensory experience. ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)