Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?


"Makouli" <men@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:R-2dnR4Z_6vUHC7anZ2dnUVZ_uCinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Paul Crowley" <slkwuoiutiuytciuyik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:UoKsj.24521$j7.452480@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Makouli" <men@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:KsadnUnb3Yop0i7anZ2dnUVZ_sOrnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Mikey, let's list the things that you refuse to discuss:
1) Selective origins of bipedalism in the earliest hominids.
(Since
you can't explain it you pretend not to notice.)

Answered (and ignored, remember Crompton?)

?

He proposed the theory of "Standing
tall in the Midday-Sun" -- in order to
stay cool.

Surreal.

Peter Wheeler
Human Ancestors Walked Tall, Stayed Cool,
Natural History, August 1993, pg. 65-66.

Pauly couldn't get his own name right
unless his mommy was there to coach
him. You guys figure out which way to
turn that light bulb yet? Hint: lefty-loosey,
righty-tighty.

OK, you can't expect anyone sensible to
keep close track of these next-to-insane
theories that emerge every few months
from the desert of PA 'thinking'.

My excuse is this case is the Crompton
is also from Liverpool, and is a particularly
idiotic 'scientist' -- with a background in
psychology AFAIR. This is a recent book
or paper:
"Origins of human bipedalism as an adaptation for locomotion
on flexible branches' Thorpe, S.K.S., Holder R.L. and Crompton,
R.H. (2007 in press) Science

Like the rest of PA 'scientists', he hasn't
the faintest clue what the subject is
about.

http://www.liv.ac.uk/premog/premog-pubs.htm

Did you miss that first time around, Pauly? I know
you don't like to acknowledge this kind of stuff because
it intrudes on your carefully nurtured delusions, but there
it is.

There what is? You should make more of an effort to not present yourself as
a vague nitwit.


.

Relevant Pages