Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
- From: "Makouli" <men@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:53:51 -0600
<claudiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fb9a30b1-5661-4f15-83d6-73899f097b20@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 15, 1:10 pm, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 15, 12:49 pm, claudiusd...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Answer the question you evasive twit.
Says the illiterate. Take Barnes advice and hit the books, Jim.
Dan Barnes: "..a number of people have suggested that the best thing
you can do is do
substantial background reading, reframe your arguement and come back
again."
Let me get this straight. You think the savanna is a forest and *I*
should hit the books?
You get something straight? That'll be the day. I suppose
Lee has already pointed out what a willfully ignorant
ignoramus you are so there's no point in going over *that*
again. I suppose he's further pointed out that no one thinks
"the savanna is a forest" and that your statement to the
contrary then constitutes a ~lie~ and that, finally, *yes*,
you should "hit the books" --advice given in good faith to
you ten years ago when you first showed up (and roundly
ignored). I suspect that you will ignore this good advice
today and that you will continue to believe that you know
something about PA when you don't. I believe Ted Holden
will continue to insist that there is a face on Mars, Ed Conrad
will persist in his efforts to elect a Carboniferous Man from
Pennsylvania, and that you, Dimmy, will continue to believe
in your powers as the greatest living evolutionary theorist
(sorry, Pauly). Your mother should hang her head in shame
--but perhaps she's left this world and thus doesn't have to
look at you and thus lament the day she slipped off that bar
stool and into the arms of all those sailors.
================================
"What's the question?" Dimmy --12/24/07
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
- From: Claudius Denk
- Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
- References:
- *** Game On ***
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
- From: Makouli
- Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
- From: rmacfarl
- Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
- From: rmacfarl
- Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
- From: Paul Crowley
- Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
- From: Makouli
- Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
- From: Paul Crowley
- Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
- From: Makouli
- Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
- From: Paul Crowley
- Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
- From: Makouli
- Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
- From: claudiusdenk
- *** Game On ***
- Prev by Date: Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
- Next by Date: Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
- Previous by thread: Dry ape "discussions" (Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
- Next by thread: Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|