Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?


"Makouli" <men@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:95mdnZU05JNiiivanZ2dnUVZ_t2inZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<claudiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fb9a30b1-5661-4f15-83d6-73899f097b20@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 15, 1:10 pm, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 15, 12:49 pm, claudiusd...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Answer the question you evasive twit.

Says the illiterate. Take Barnes advice and hit the books, Jim.

Dan Barnes: "..a number of people have suggested that the best thing
you can do is do
substantial background reading, reframe your arguement and come back
again."

Let me get this straight. You think the savanna is a forest and *I*
should hit the books?

You get something straight? That'll be the day. I suppose
Lee has already pointed out what a willfully ignorant
ignoramus you are so there's no point in going over *that*
again.

I think you guys should have checked notes with each other before you
started volunteering the specifics of conventional theory. Now you got
problems.

I suppose he's further pointed out that no one thinks
"the savanna is a forest" and that your statement to the
contrary then constitutes a ~lie~

I think you need to be more concerned about the fact that y'all can't get
your stories straight.

and that, finally, *yes*,
you should "hit the books" --advice given in good faith to
you ten years ago when you first showed up (and roundly
ignored). I suspect that you will ignore this good advice
today and that you will continue to believe that you know
something about PA when you don't.

Don't look now but your evasiveness is showing.

I believe Ted Holden
will continue to insist that there is a face on Mars, Ed Conrad
will persist in his efforts to elect a Carboniferous Man from
Pennsylvania, and that you, Dimmy, will continue to believe
in your powers as the greatest living evolutionary theorist
(sorry, Pauly). Your mother should hang her head in shame
--but perhaps she's left this world and thus doesn't have to
look at you and thus lament the day she slipped off that bar
stool and into the arms of all those sailors.

I don't know why you are so mad at me. I think that anybody reading this
whole thread can only come to one conclusion that being that I gave you
multiple opportunities to retract your statement and/or explain your
reasoning.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
    ... Take Barnes advice and hit the books, ... Lee has already pointed out what a willfully ignorant ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?
    ... Take Barnes advice and hit the books, ... Dan Barnes: "..a number of people have suggested that the best thing ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Review: 4th Ed
    ... As its own system: 'Not worth it'. ... I liked every one of the core books better in 3.5. ... No more random hit points. ... You now have Will defense, ...
    (rec.games.frp.dnd)
  • Re: Merry Christmas... What did you recieve
    ... I got books! ... No sewing or quilting books, but I did finally get the ... More importantly, DH loves his oud, I hit it on the nose ... play so far but WOW it is a lot different to my old basic Janome. ...
    (rec.crafts.textiles.quilting)
  • Re: Conventional Evasiveness
    ... Apiths never ventured more than 50/100 yds away from a tree. ... Spears are useless against hyena and lions. ... Ignorance can be cured, but in your case, see a shrink before you hit ... "Hit the books, kid!" ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)