Dry ape "discussions" (Re: Michael Clark, would you like to make a retraction?

Typical dry ape discussions:


Op 16-02-2008 22:51, in artikel
bVItj.57820$Pv2.4009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Claudius Denk
<claudiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:


"Lee Olsen" <paleocity@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:b87b3a52-52a4-4aca-996a-856826781037@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 15, 2:16 pm, claudiusd...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Feb 15, 1:10 pm, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 15, 12:49 pm, claudiusd...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Answer the question you evasive twit.

Says the illiterate. Take Barnes advice and hit the books, Jim.

Dan Barnes: "..a number of people have suggested that the best thing
you can do is do
substantial background reading, reframe your arguement and come back
again."

Let me get this straight. You think the savanna is a forest and *I*
should hit the books?

What's the matter loon, you don't have a direct quote? Of course not,
because there isn't one.
See a shrink.

Me thinks thou doth protest too much.



.

Relevant Pages