Re: How can one argue
- From: "Makouli" <men@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:04:38 -0500
<claudiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8c95a3fd-4e8e-428d-8b70-9c390786b09b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Apr 18, 10:17 pm, rmacfarl <rmacf...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 19, 12:23 pm, claudiusd...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Human intellectual, communal, and social behaviors would have
had to have been selected by the process of natural selection
or they would not exist. Right?
Wrong.
How can one argue with logic like this?
You'll find a way, Dimmy. You always do.
But if you want to consider why Ross responded
as he did, you might consider that your leading
question was, in fact, "Wrong". Then you might
do a little *library research*, or take an elementary
class in biological evolution, or (better yet) ask
a polite question in a sci NG. Wouldn't that be fun?
Try this: http://tinyurl.com/5kusdx
===================================
" Where's the hypothesis?
Where are the details?"
Dimmy --01/14/08
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How can one argue
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: How can one argue
- References:
- How can one argue
- From: claudiusdenk
- How can one argue
- Prev by Date: How can one argue
- Next by Date: Re: As long as Olson posts here, we're not going to see much sensible.
- Previous by thread: How can one argue
- Next by thread: Re: How can one argue
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
