Re: we're not going to see much sensible.
- From: Day Brown <daybrown@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 22:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 19, 8:50 pm, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 19, 6:24 pm, Day Brown <daybr...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:For one, facts are most often challenged in a disrespectful way.
On Apr 19, 6:27 pm, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:> >That's not stupidity, just asinine.
And your adding to the flame war is not?
Thats a statement of fact Lee.
What would you know about facts?
There's no real attempt at discourse, only the effort to prove
superiority in order to feed an ego. Epictetus:"When I man showed me I
was wrong, I was grateful to no longer be thinking wrongly. But when I
performed the same service for another, he always went away angry."
I've worked with the retarded, and when you show them they are wrong,
they are not angry at me, but dismayed. Anger is often expressed as
asininity, and is a symptom of neurosis, not stupidity.
The facts in this thread are few; all the remains of the early
hominids at issue would fit in a foot locker. We have no way of
knowing whether they are really representative of most hominids alive
at the time, and the fact is, we really dont know how many there were
in ecosystems that did not favor the preservation of fossils.
The recent skull found in Chad was in what had been a seasonal delta
like the Okavango. We have no way of knowing if the bone found was
deposited there by floodwaters or whether the individual died in situ.
We know that animals, including hominids, when sick, even if normally
living on savannah, will seek water, and more often die near it. The
proximity of the waterway proves very little.
We really dont have many facts, and what we do have does not warrant
the passion I've seen expressed.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: we're not going to see much sensible.
- From: Makouli
- Re: we're not going to see much sensible.
- References:
- Diverting attention from the real issues of hominid evolution
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: Diverting attention from the real issues of hominid evolution
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Diverting attention from the real issues of hominid evolution
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: Diverting attention from the real issues of hominid evolution
- From: Makouli
- Re: Diverting attention from the real issues of hominid evolution
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: Diverting attention from the real issues of hominid evolution
- From: Makouli
- Re: Diverting attention from the real issues of hominid evolution
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: Diverting attention from the real issues of hominid evolution
- From: Day Brown
- Re: Diverting attention from the real issues of hominid evolution
- From: Lee Olsen
- As long as Olson posts here, we're not going to see much sensible.
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: As long as Olson posts here, we're not going to see much sensible.
- From: Day Brown
- Re: As long as Braun posts here, we're not going to see much sensible.
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: As long as Braun posts here, we're not going to see much sensible.
- From: Day Brown
- Re: we're not going to see much sensible.
- From: Lee Olsen
- Diverting attention from the real issues of hominid evolution
- Prev by Date: Re: How can one argue with Jim aka Claudius?
- Next by Date: both aquatic and savannah?
- Previous by thread: Re: we're not going to see much sensible.
- Next by thread: Re: we're not going to see much sensible.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|