Savanna Fanatics

SF thinks that because some non-aq.mammals are hairless, AAT is falsified:
Lots of animals are hairless, you idiot.

My little boy, apparently you have never heard of statistics or
correlations.

Inform a little bit.
I try again. FYI:

AAT = Homo littoral diaspora.
³Aquatic Ape Theory², contrary to what many PAs still want to believe, is
not about apes, nor about having been aquatic, nor about australopiths.
The physiological, anatomical, behavioural & DNA differences between Homo &
Pan show that our Homo ancestors some time after the Homo/Pan split ~5 Ma
lived at the waterside (coast/lake/river-side).
Homo remains 1.8 Ma are found in places as far as Mojokerto (Java) etc.
AAT says their ancestors after the H/P split got there along shorelines, not
over dry & open plains.
Luckily, leading PAs such as Ph.Tobias
http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~mvaneech/outthere.htm
& Chr.Stringer
http://www.gnxp.com/MT2/archives/003982.html
now agree with a "wet" past & shoreline dispersals
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AAT

The combination of furlessness & SC fat is only seen in mammals that spend a
lot of time in water (not vice versa, my little boy!).
This alone might intelligigent people make think that our ancestors evolved
at the waterside, but no, there are still a lot of loons that stubbornly
refuse to consider this possibility.


.

Relevant Pages