Re: Savanna Versus Aquatic equals Junk Science
- From: "Paul Crowley" <slkwuoiutiuytciuyik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 11:47:29 +0100
"Claudius Denk" <claudiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3348e837-95fa-4549-93ef-9d00b62fb9a4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Aquatic Idiot stated:
None of these feature, my little boy, is seen
in savanna mammals.
Savanna Dimwit replied:
Really? But humans display some measure of your
list and they're savanna mammals.
Aquatic idiot replied:
Yes, if some fool says we're savanna mammals, then
we're savanna mammals...
Savanna mammals, my little boy, have a keen sense
of smell, are fast, don't need much water, don't much
iodine, don't need much sodium etc.etc.
Monsoon Cities-in-the-trees Nutcase said:
This knife cuts both ways, you idiot. Marc, at best you can say that
Hominids have *some* traits that are consistent with aquaticism. And
your opponents employ the same dimwittedness in opposing your vague
nonsense.
It's idiotic to suggest that humans are either aquatic adapted or
savanna adapted.
Clearly.
Junk science happens when scientists believe something
based on just some of what they see.
Real science involves careful consideration of *ALL* of the evidence.
Real science consists in REJECTING
bad theories on the basis of the
evidence, and then seeing what is left.
Each of the Savanna, the Aquatic, and
the Monsoon-Cities-in-the-Trees theories
can be rejected on the most obvious of
evidence.
Paul.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Savanna Versus Aquatic equals Junk Science
- From: Claudius Denk
- Re: Savanna Science
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: Savanna Versus Aquatic equals Junk Science
- References:
- Savanna Versus Aquatic equals Junk Science
- From: Claudius Denk
- Savanna Versus Aquatic equals Junk Science
- Prev by Date: Re: Savanna Versus Aquatic equals Junk Science
- Next by Date: Re: Savanna Science
- Previous by thread: Re: Savanna Versus Aquatic equals Junk Science
- Next by thread: Re: Savanna Science
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|