Re: Savanna Versus Aquatic equals Junk Science
- From: Lee Olsen <paleocity@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 08:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
On May 26, 5:45 am, "Paul Crowley"
<slkwuoiutiuytciu...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Claudius Denk" <claudiusd...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e9027425-a6c2-45ee-abe7-ccf6aeab9511@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Real science involves careful consideration of *ALL* of the evidence.
Real science consists in REJECTING
bad theories on the basis of the
evidence, and then seeing what is left.
Uh huh. And so . . .?
Your head is full of bad theories --
so obviously bad that any remotely
competent scientist would disregard
them. (Of course, that's also true of
the Savanna and Aquatic theorists.)
Squeaks the brainless loon who claims Neandertals
didn't hunt and chimps can't dig.
Message-ID: <3257D73F.73A7@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>#1/1
"You really crack me up, Paul Crowley. If you keep it up I'm going to
hurt myself.
First, you present the "fact" that there were no lions in Europe as
evidence that Neanderthals didn't hunt. Then, when someone points out
that there *were* lions in Europe, you claim that as *conclusive*
evidence that Neanderthals didn't hunt.
Message-ID: <1160837514.938748.252i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Paul Crowley: "Chimps do NOT have the capacity to dig."
.
- References:
- Savanna Versus Aquatic equals Junk Science
- From: Claudius Denk
- Re: Savanna Versus Aquatic equals Junk Science
- From: Paul Crowley
- Re: Savanna Versus Aquatic equals Junk Science
- From: Claudius Denk
- Re: Savanna Versus Aquatic equals Junk Science
- From: Paul Crowley
- Savanna Versus Aquatic equals Junk Science
- Prev by Date: Re: Savanna Versus Aquatic equals Junk Science
- Next by Date: Re: Savanna Versus Aquatic equals Junk Science
- Previous by thread: Re: Savanna Versus Aquatic equals Junk Science
- Next by thread: Re: Savanna Versus Aquatic equals Junk Science
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
