Re: Fish trap
- From: nickname <alas_my_loves@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 20:53:13 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 20, 10:05 pm, Rich Travsky <traRvE...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
nickname wrote:
On Apr 6, 8:55 pm, Rich Travsky <traRvE...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Marc Verhaegen wrote:
Are you really too stupid to discern between "fossils" & "ancestors",
Travsky??
Ask DD/nickname - it's his statement! LOL
Yes, Travsky is too stupid apparently.
You're the one who it!
"Our ancestral hominids weren't African river dwellers AFAICT"
LOL LOL LOL
Human ancestors were hominids (therefore ancestral), but not all
hominids were human ancestors.
Though they may have traveled along river corridors before the
development of nets, boats, I don't think they were specialized river
or riverside dwellers far from seacoasts until dugouts and nets.
The question is, how long have fish traps been used? As long asantelope snares? Before nets were developed?
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Fish trap
- Next by Date: Re: Many people landed on Mars
- Previous by thread: Re: Fish trap
- Index(es):