Re: "Sea Otter feeding in Red Sea"
- From: Rich Travsky <traRvEsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 21:42:51 -0600
nickname wrote:
On May 11, 9:58 pm, Rich Travsky <traRvE...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
nickname wrote:
On May 5, 5:08 pm, Rich Travsky <traRvE...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
nickname wrote:
On May 5, 3:23 pm, Rich Travsky <traRvE...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
nickname wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88aZ3jZAgYQ
Why does he need a full wet suit and googles? :-D
He doesn't. Would you backfloat naked in front of a video camera for
distribution on the internet? I wouldn't either.
This is weak, even for you.
I answered your weak question.
It was a devastating question.
Naked? They guy could just wear trunks.
So?
"So" - LOL. Another weak response.
again So? wet suit, trunks, goggles are modern accessories, not
needed for backfloating.
Then why is he wearing them?
And your lame excuse doesn't explain the head piece OR the goggles.
excuse? The guy is skinny, wears thermoinsulation, because he's in the
middle of a diving session (most likely). There is a learning curve to
diving without goggles, but the Moken kids (and some European)
traditionally dove without them, when foraging for seafood, trained to
see tiny objects far below surface.
As Marc says, we are no longer aquatic to the same extent as our
ancestors were, largely due to technology and trade.
LOL - if we were MORE aquatic then how are we LESS aquatic now? Hmmm?
trade and technology allows foraging more efficiently en masse.
Swimming trunks and googles affected our evolution???
.This gets funnier and funnier!
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Sea Otter feeding in Red Sea"
- From: nickname
- Re: "Sea Otter feeding in Red Sea"
- Prev by Date: Re: Seaweed? 50mile trek inland, beachcombing
- Next by Date: Re: MIT: No easy answers in evolution of human language
- Previous by thread: Re: Seaweed? 50mile trek inland, beachcombing
- Next by thread: Re: "Sea Otter feeding in Red Sea"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
