Re: "I've never liked the Savannah hypothesis. The savannah one is pretty much out the window now."


And this is your justification for posting stuff which is
hilariously false?

savanna nonsense is hilarious false

my little boy, you have 0 justification for posting stuff which is hilarious
false

this is what i posted - i'm not responsible for the comment below but it's
1000 x more correct that your savanna rubbish:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/c...300857029.html
*AUSTRALIAN scientists working on an archaeological cave dig in South Africa
have found evidence that some prehistoric humans began eating seafood and
painting up to 30,000 years earlier than had been thought.
The discovery of this artistic, beach-loving, lobster-chomping hominid (I do
hope they christen him "Bronte-saurus") is invaluable to the understanding
of our forebears. "It is hard to get into the mind of early people and find
out what they were thinking," a University of NSW archaeologist, Dr Andy
Herries, said.*
I've never liked the Savannah hypothesis. The first time I read about AAT it
made perfect sense. Evolution requires purpose.
The first spear was for impaling fish. The first rock tool was for breaking
shellfish. It's all so very logical.
I daresay it will become the accepted theory over time. The savannah one is
pretty much out the window now.





.