Re: Elaine Morgan: 88 Years old and still head and shoulders above your typical anthropologist

On Dec 7, 2:37 pm, Algis <algiskuliu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 7, 11:59 pm, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 7, 4:51 am, Algis <algiskuliu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Dec 6, 3:25 pm, Algis <algiskuliu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"You people"? Tarring people

Oh, you mean changing the original hypothesis beyond
any recognition to the original is not tarring?

No, it's not. It's called clarifying. I haven't changed anything Hardy
or Morgan wrote. All I've done is add my slant on their ideas.

Algis, your silly little wading-caused-bipedalism notion has nothing
to do with anything Hardy or Morgan wrote. So it's kind of absurd for
you to suggest you are like minded with them. They indicate hominids
swimming. You don't. You do the same thing that conventional
theorists like Lee do. You introduce an absurd notion, when it is
poorly recieved you just dumb it down and keep it vague and pretend
that it has survived scrutiny based on its merits rather than its
vagueness.


I can see that there is no amount of evidence that will change your
mind. Anything in favour of waterside hypotheses

There's no such thing as a waterside hypothesis. Waterside is a
habitat. It's your silly wading notions that are the problem. You're
such an evasive twit you won't even correctly label your hypothesis.



.

Relevant Pages