Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: rmacfarl <rmacfarl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:57:40 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 18, 11:34 am, Algis <algiskuliu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 18, 7:58 am, rmacfarl <rmacf...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 18, 1:46 am, mclark <mbclar...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It would have been so much easier if you'd just written "yes, i can
see humans have lived in waterside habitats more than chimps since the
LCA" but I guess that would be a heretical thing for you to do. What
on earth would the others say?
Heretical? You want to accuse someone of avoiding a question for fear
of transgressing orthodoxy? How about this one then:
rmacf...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ross Macfarlane) wrote in message ...
Final question - when did the hominids become savannah-adapted?
Never.
I don't get it. I was being the heretic there, I was not cow-towing to
authority.
Algis Kuliukas
Oh yes you were. But don't worry. In his next post, Marc gave your
answer his blessing.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: rmacfarl
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- References:
- "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: Claudius Denk
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: Algis
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: mclark
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: Algis
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: mclark
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: Algis
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: mclark
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: mclark
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: rmacfarl
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: Algis
- "Waterside" is meaningless
- Prev by Date: Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- Next by Date: Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- Previous by thread: Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- Next by thread: Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading