Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: mclark <mbclark55@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:28:07 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 18, 9:07 am, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Personally, I don't really give a *** as
long as the arguiments make sense."
Algis --12/18/2008
"One misrepresentation of an argument,
one invention, one dream and one piece of
confused thinking."--Algis Kuliukas, 02/09/2005.
SFs scrutinise what AATers say :-D why don't AATers scrutinise what SFs
say??
Because then AATer's would have to be able
to follow a sequencial argument, think critcally,
reason carefully, comprehend what they read,
avoid logical fallacies, etc etc --all of which they
demonstrate their incapacity on a daily basis.
"Repeating imbecilities doesn't make
them true." Marco --04/21/2003
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- References:
- "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: Claudius Denk
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: mclark
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: Algis
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: mclark
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: mclark
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: rmacfarl
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: Algis
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: rmacfarl
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: rmacfarl
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: Algis
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: mclark
- Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- "Waterside" is meaningless
- Prev by Date: Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- Next by Date: Re: Flocking strategies to evade crocodiles for Algis's waste-deep wading A'piths
- Previous by thread: Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- Next by thread: Re: "Waterside" is meaningless
- Index(es):
Loading