Re: "Waterside" is meaningless




Op 18-12-2008 19:20, in artikel
66602965-85d3-4539-9fac-1d10179242c7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mclark
<mbclark55@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:

On Dec 18, 12:16 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
savanna fool:

"Personally, I don't really give a *** as
long as the arguiments make sense."
                          Algis --12/18/2008
"One misrepresentation of an argument,
one invention, one dream and one piece of
confused thinking."--Algis Kuliukas,  02/09/2005.
SFs scrutinise what AATers say   :-D   why don't AATers scrutinise what SFs
say??

The Great Scientist answered:

Because then AATer's would have to be able
to follow a sequencial argument, think critcally,
reason carefully, comprehend what they read,
avoid logical fallacies, etc etc --all of which they
demonstrate their incapacity on a daily basis.

:-D
man, you're delusional

Sure, Marco, and you're Queen Sheba.

Only fools talk about something they don't inform about.

.

Quantcast