Re: Tobias 1995


There seem to be still a lot of persistent misunderstandings among pro-
& anti-AAT people about subcutaneous fat.
- Our SC fat has nothing to do with brain fats. ...

Well, somewhere or another, someone needs to come up with a consistent
scenario that covers some of these issues ...bipedal first, big
brain later...

The AAT scenario is very consistent & completely gradual:
...

I googled "pachyostosis Madar" and "crawford cunnane," with mixed
results.  I did read them and the above post.  I think it is good that
you and others, such as Algis, are working on a coherent scenario.

SF:
It is anything but coherent. Marc puts forth nonsense like snorkel noses
and flipper feet. ...

answered in other post

.... snipped on Algis : ask him

SF:
Here's a choice example of Marc's "coherent" approach in action... he denies
that australopiths were obligate bipeds, despite all the fossil evidence.

There is no fossil evedence that apiths were more bipedal than bonobos or
gibbons.
There is obvious evidence that some apiths were branch-haning: curved
phalanges etc., but the savanna fools deny this.

He thinks
that they became quadrupeds and thence to become chimps and gorillas.

the usual misrepresentations: these people are coward &/or stupid

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/msg/714fa15842b...
 ...
 Now, 2d part of answer. Listen good. Bit more difficult. Long long ago (2
 Ma) times cooled down & dried (Pleistocene - forget everything between
 brackets: it's for the grown-ups).  It was colder in water, there were less
 swamps, & less of the foods they liked in the swamp, so they liked to be
 more on dry ground in the forest, wouldn't you?  But why not move on 4 legs
 there?  It's very easy when you have long arms & short legs, don't you
 think?  ...

yes, obvious

When challenged, Marc responds with evasions and insults. He doesn't like
to post links to articles because then people could check for themselves.

ridiculous liar : the poor man must be really stupid if can't find
everything at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AAT + files
these idiots simply donet want to be informed




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Tobias 1995
    ... Our SC fat has nothing to do with brain fats. ... you and others, such as Algis, are working on a coherent scenario. ... of all the other scenarios for, say, bipedalism. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Tobias 1995
    ... Our SC fat has nothing to do with brain fats. ... The AAT scenario is very consistent & completely gradual: ... of all the other scenarios for, say, bipedalism. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: muscle sunburn
    ... sunblock but usually neglect the legs as it seems unnecessary. ... other areas where there is more fat, I do feel it a bit more. ... near the surface, such as the lower back - fat, and shoulders, bone affect ... There was some wind but nothing remarkable. ...
    (rec.bicycles.misc)
  • Re: Losing weight, except for arms?
    ... Losing bodyfat doesnt work that way. ... If you lost some fat off your arms and chest you will be able ... gram per body weight, why not consider 1 gram per lean weight which to ... You don't need to work out your legs if you jog .. ...
    (misc.fitness.weights)
  • Re: Would you use this service ?
    ... You probably gained muscle, which is good, because it burns more ... legs, and all the leg presses have given me speed skate thighs. ... It was never my intention to convert fat to muscle. ... of weight for the poor horses. ...
    (rec.food.cooking)
Quantcast