Re: Re correction: Re: Small brained Hobbits were not smart as big brained Homo with evidence so far

Lee Olsen:
Mario Petrinovic:
Lee Olsen:
Mario Petrinovic:
> Ok, I give up. I admit everything, you are a winner.

Nope, that wouldn't be science. Moore may yet find more evidence
about
hobbit flintknapping. They are looking in more Flores caves. But then
again he might not, until then it is just wait and see.

Maybe some day they will find a chimp that can actually make a complex
stone tool, but until then, that is just wait and see also.
-------------------------------------------------------------

Of course this isn't science. I tried with you the scientific way,

How did you do that? You don't know any more about science than you do
stone tools.

but this didn't work. Science says that Moore is right. There was NO
objections on his study. NO scientiests had ANY objection.

Read the article again. How many times do I have to cite not all
agree with him.
So you know more than Shea???
---------------------------------------------------------------

??? Shea highly prized the analysis. Regarding Shea's remark, it is
Shea who DOESN'T KNOW. His remark was totaly empty of any content.
But, there aren't others important. I ask YOU on what basis you
disregard this? On the basis that others "aren't convinced". On which basis
others "aren't convinced" nobody knows (actually it is known, it is the
prejudice of human intellect, which is ALSO TOTALY EMPTY of content), and
you don't know. And then you are accusing me for this and that. Jesus.
--------------------------------------------------------

You think because they found little people @20 kya on an island means
they were always little?
What about pygmy mammoths on Wrangle Island, do you think their
ancestors were always small?
----------------------------------------------------------

??? Jesus, it is their small BRAIN that counts here. You claim that
they had bigger brain, and then their brain become smaller? Well, I must say
that this is an interesting proposition.
Do you want to know what do I think. I think that they are
proto-Homo. They are like Homo was say 3 mya. They stayed separated from the
rest of Homo just like the unique fauna at those places stayed unchanged. It
is Homo who destroys environments. But west of Movius line came Homo who
didn't destroy environment. And even further away there were Hobbits, the
remains of small brained Homo.
---------------------------------------------------------

Moor don't have
to find anything more (he already found enough).

No, he hasn't found anything to prove hobbits made complex stone
tools, he denied this himself.
You need to learn to read, first, then study what the difference
between simple tools and a complex
tools. You are making claims even the scientists haven't made.

The therory of big brain
equals big mental capacity is wrong.

Lip service, no hobbit has been proven to have made any complex tools.
Why do you
keep making a fool of yourself when you already admitted you know
little about tools?
-----------------------------------------------------------

Well, you can continue to parrot your truth, but big brained Homo
started complex tool making only later (and this can, in NO way, be linked to size of brain by the mean of increased mental capacity with the increased brain capacity), and the complexity increased with the diminishing of brain, not with expanding.
------------------------------------------------------------
Secondly, the fact that chimps don't make stone tools doesn't prove
anything,

Just because someone who knows nothing about tools says so?? I thought
you said you
"tried with you the scientific way"? So science is now based on
ignorance of stone tools?

just like Kirkland's dummies don't prove anything. Because we saw
other examples of chimp mental capacity.

Yes, lower mental capacity, just like human children before they grow
up.
------------------------------------------------------------

You want to say that children are unable to make stone tools?
-- Mario Petrinovic

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Appeal to Abstract Authority - a never ending fallacy by materialists
    ... I have never before heard anyone call reality "abstract authority". ... "Science and Religion: A personal view of their relation....." ... It's pretty clear that language comes from the human brain. ... subset of, philosophical materialists. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Kurt Godel: Unpublished Philosophical Essays, by F. A. Rodriquez-Consuegra and Kurt Godel
    ... non-contributor to science like you. ... > mind, David. ... > identified dopamine as at brain neurotransmitter. ... > philosophers, ...
    (comp.theory)
  • Re: End-consumption (was Re: The Physicalist Error)
    ... belong to primitive parts or recent parts of the brain. ... I don't need any science to get myself to ... norms and standards, including those of modern ... Liberation is free of name and form, ...
    (talk.religion.buddhism)
  • Re: Must watch TV...
    ... Oliver Sacks Ponders the Brain and Musichttp://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/30/arts/television/30nova.html ... Television Review | 'Nova: Musical Minds' ... Our Brains on Music: The Science ... "Musical Minds," which with the season premiere of the newsmagazine ...
    (rec.music.beatles)
  • Re: Evolution of the supernatural
    ... > flow of ideas of science, how anyone could be a skeptic. ... Most PSI phenomena I've encountered are easily explained using existing ... excruciating detail what their drugs are doing, ... The more we learn of the brain, the more anyone learns about it, the ...
    (talk.origins)
Quantcast