Re: all serious PAs now reject the savanna nonsense
- From: mclark <mbclark55@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 16, 2:22 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[..]
Stringer 2001
In the past I have agreed that we lack plausible models for the origins of
bipedalism & that wading in water can facilitate BP locomotion ... As for
coastal colonisation, I argued in my Nature N&V paper last year that this
was an event in the late Pleistocene that may have facilitated the spread
of modern humans.
[...]
....and from the same email that you refuse
to aknowledge or cite properly:
"But adapting to coastal living is,
of course, not the same as living
IN the water." Stringer --09/14/2001
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: all serious PAs now reject the savanna nonsense
- From: Algis Kuliukas
- Re: all serious PAs now reject the savanna nonsense
- From: Mario Petrinovic
- Re: all serious PAs now reject the savanna nonsense
- Prev by Date: Re: SF now thinks neandertals ate beaver
- Next by Date: Re: SF now thinks neandertals ate beaver
- Previous by thread: Re: all serious PAs now reject the littoral nonsense
- Next by thread: Re: all serious PAs now reject the savanna nonsense
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|