Re: all serious PAs now reject the savanna nonsense
- From: "Mario Petrinovic" <mario.petrinovic1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:03:23 +0200
mclark:
Marc Verhaegen:
[..]
Stringer 2001
In the past I have agreed that we lack plausible models for the origins of
bipedalism & that wading in water can facilitate BP locomotion ... As for
coastal colonisation, I argued in my Nature N&V paper last year that this
was an event in the late Pleistocene that may have facilitated the spread
of modern humans.
[...]
....and from the same email that you refuse
to aknowledge or cite properly:
"But adapting to coastal living is,
of course, not the same as living
IN the water." Stringer --09/14/2001
--------------------------------------------------------------
Hm, it looks like you think that coastal living has nothing
whatsoever with water. How did you come to that stupid idea?
-- Mario Petrinovic
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: all serious PAs now reject the savanna nonsense
- From: mclark
- Re: all serious PAs now belive the savanna hypothesis.
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: all serious PAs now reject the savanna nonsense
- References:
- Re: all serious PAs now reject the savanna nonsense
- From: mclark
- Re: all serious PAs now reject the savanna nonsense
- Prev by Date: Re: Cliffs
- Next by Date: Zilhman and the rest completely misunderstand waterside hypotheses
- Previous by thread: Re: all serious PAs now reject the savanna nonsense
- Next by thread: Re: all serious PAs now belive the savanna hypothesis.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|