Re: all serious PAs now belive the savanna hypothesis.

On Jun 17, 7:03 am, "Mario Petrinovic" <mario.petrinov...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

        Hm, it looks like you think that coastal living has nothing
whatsoever with water. How did you come to that stupid idea?
 -- Mario Petrinovic

Name a coastal site older than 2.6 million years. Why do stupid people
refuse to read the archaeological record?
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: all serious PAs now belive the savanna hypothesis.
    ... >> whatsoever with water. ... How did you come to that stupid idea? ... > Name a coastal site older than 2.6 million years. ... So you do admit all coastal sites weren't under water at 2.6 mya? ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: all serious PAs now belive the savanna hypothesis.
    ... whatsoever with water. ... How did you come to that stupid idea? ... Name a coastal site older than 2.6 million years. ... So you do admit all coastal sites weren't under water at 2.6 mya? ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: section five the Public Order Act
    ... I wouldn't baulk at that or have any problem with it whatsoever. ... I could probably start by explaining that when some people in authority are ... weak boss make stupid decisions and compound his ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: all serious PAs now belive the savanna hypothesis.
    ... it looks like you think that coastal living has nothing ... > whatsoever with water. ... How did you come to that stupid idea? ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Guy Chapman: Did You Know?
    ... Chapman posted a stupid and unnecessary reply to my "A Simple ... deranged obsessive cretin. ... perfectly legitimate discussions started by me ... post had nothing whatsoever to do with cycling, ...
    (uk.rec.cycling)