Re: all serious PAs now belive the savanna hypothesis.
- From: Paul Crowley <dsfdsfdsfs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:59:13 +0100
Gerrit Hanenburg wrote:
Other things being equal, coastal sites of
2.6 mya should be at about sea level now.
BUT other things are rarely equal. Firstly
the sea advanced and retreated hundreds or
thousands of times during hominid occupation
(before and around 2.6 mya, and in recent
times). When seas advance, wave action rips
up the ground. Go to any coast and note the
difference between the ground above the water
and that below (i.e. that which you can see
when the tide goes out).
Lots and lots of sediment.
But where does all that huge amount of
sediment come from? It's the land being
churned up as the sea advances. Those
huge sand-banks off the coast of many
continents (such as North America) are
mostly a temporary phenomenon, and will
soon get washed away into the ocean
(i.e. within a few tens of thousands of
years). In that sediment are minute
traces of ground-up hominid fossils, each
fossil scattered over probably hundreds
or thousands of miles.
Ideal for preservation. Marine sediments provide the
best fossil record.
It's ideal when the fossil arrives in
one piece an eon later, and is not then
exposed above water and then reclaimed
by the sea. Hominids fossils would
rarely have been deposited in one piece
in a marine sediment.
So we would not expect coastal sites to
survive. But occasionally they do. Of
course, those of >2.6 mya will be in Africa.
The best hominid sites found in Africa are
found close to paleo-coasts:
No, they're not. Get some better information on the
geology of the Afar triangle
The Afar triangle was the Afar sea.
It dried up leaving large salt deposits.
And what about Sterkfontein, Swartkrans,Koobi Fora?
Mostly the remains of refugee groups,
which had fled inland -- the only
apparently safe direction. (Therefore
predominantly young and male.)
Bahr el Ghazal,
Is anything there reliable?
Paul.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: all serious PAs now belive the savanna hypothesis.
- From: Gerrit Hanenburg
- Re: all serious PAs now belive the savanna hypothesis.
- References:
- Re: all serious PAs now reject the savanna nonsense
- From: mclark
- Re: all serious PAs now reject the savanna nonsense
- From: Mario Petrinovic
- Re: all serious PAs now belive the savanna hypothesis.
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: all serious PAs now belive the savanna hypothesis.
- From: J.LyonLayden
- Re: all serious PAs now belive the savanna hypothesis.
- From: Paul Crowley
- Re: all serious PAs now belive the savanna hypothesis.
- From: Gerrit Hanenburg
- Re: all serious PAs now reject the savanna nonsense
- Prev by Date: Re: all serious PAs now belive the savanna hypothesis.
- Next by Date: Re: all serious PAs now belive the savanna hypothesis.
- Previous by thread: Re: all serious PAs now belive the savanna hypothesis.
- Next by thread: Re: all serious PAs now belive the savanna hypothesis.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|