Re: Black genes more dominant by a ratio of 4 to 1?
From: P.Comm (tjsrno_at_spampost.com)
Date: 06/24/04
- Next message: P.Comm: "Re: Racial Skull Differences..."
- Previous message: P.Comm: "Re: Black genes more dominant by a ratio of 4 to 1?"
- Maybe in reply to: P.Comm: "Re: Black genes more dominant by a ratio of 4 to 1?"
- Next in thread: P.Comm: "Re: Black genes more dominant by a ratio of 4 to 1?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 21:49:30 GMT
"MIB529" <man_in_black529@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4ad78f65.0406231228.faee168@posting.google.com...
> desertcactus@emailcorner.net (DesertCactus) wrote in message
news:<f25f7f62.0406211320.593f813b@posting.google.com>...
> > >
> > > Probably from Frances Cress-Welsing and her obsession with melanin.
> >
> > So... Is it true or not, or do you not know?
>
> It's not true. First off, most genes don't fall on the dominant/recessive
> scale. Secondly, every chromosome only comes in pairs. Thirdly, there's
> nothing unique about a gene which makes it black or white.
You are wrong. I posted information on lineages in clades - ONE GENE
cartried the entire package of behavior and appearance.
Genes are not black or white - and the use of language in "common lingo" is
confusing things. ONE gene can carry proteins that DO code for a whole
package of behavior/appearance. The experiments were done, I posted info on
this.
- Next message: P.Comm: "Re: Racial Skull Differences..."
- Previous message: P.Comm: "Re: Black genes more dominant by a ratio of 4 to 1?"
- Maybe in reply to: P.Comm: "Re: Black genes more dominant by a ratio of 4 to 1?"
- Next in thread: P.Comm: "Re: Black genes more dominant by a ratio of 4 to 1?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
