Re: Black genes more dominant by a ratio of 4 to 1?

From: P.Comm (tjsrno_at_spampost.com)
Date: 06/26/04 

Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 23:29:59 GMT

"MIB529" <man_in_black529@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4ad78f65.0406251356.3c530f4d@posting.google.com...
> "P.Comm" <tjsrno@spampost.com> wrote in message
news:<K%HCc.12479$bs4.4673@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
> > "MIB529" <man_in_black529@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:4ad78f65.0406231228.faee168@posting.google.com...
> > > desertcactus@emailcorner.net (DesertCactus) wrote in message
> > news:<f25f7f62.0406211320.593f813b@posting.google.com>...
> > > > >
> > > > > Probably from Frances Cress-Welsing and her obsession with
melanin.
> > > >
> > > > So... Is it true or not, or do you not know?
> > >
> > > It's not true. First off, most genes don't fall on the
dominant/recessive
> > > scale. Secondly, every chromosome only comes in pairs. Thirdly,
there's
> > > nothing unique about a gene which makes it black or white.
> >
> > You are wrong. I posted information on lineages in clades - ONE GENE
> > cartried the entire package of behavior and appearance.
>
> Yes, but there is no evidence of ONE GENE being responsible for dark
> skin, more everted lips, broad noses, prognathism, and dolichocephaly.

There is no evidence because no one is looking for that kind of evidence.
It's not allowed. There IS inferential evidence. Blacks that fully look
white - that marry from then on with other blacks that fully look white -
never revert to ANY black characteristics. They remain looking white - and
for all intents and purposes - WHITE. My suggestion was that there may be a
gene that has the "entire package" that just got bred out completely. That
ONE GENE CAN do this - is proven with other studies of lineages and clades.
ONE GENE carries the whole apprearance - AND BEHAVIOR. Let's not forget
that part.
>
> The idea of "dominant black genes" was first something white racists
> claimed, which black racists later picked up on.

They are dominant for their traits. No one can deny that. Or, perhaps I
should say that another way - what society, all of society, sees with their
eyeballs is still a black person 100% of the time when they are half black
and half white.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Forrest and Casanova Were Both Left Embarrassed When They
    ... it's scientists, ... You conflate science with atheism by referring to it in terms such as ... "Your inability to provide any evidence for any research in any ... 'Gene duplication must ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
    ... care to share with us the argument or evidence that you found ... new traits can evolve through gene ... The result is called a pseudogene. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: OT: Darwins Doubt
    ... If religion is an evolutionary trait, ... The answer is: evidence. ... In the case of evolution, that's hundreds of thousands of individual ... Another aspect of a putative "god gene" might be that we are not so much ...
    (rec.arts.mystery)
  • Re: EXPOSED! : Blind Speculation and Evolutionary Bias
    ... Various scientific experts share evidence and proofs. ... The first argument, presented by Gary Parker, confuses mutations ... Gene ... pseudogene, the new species will also carry the pseudogene. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Scientists are half-autistic
    ... The gene for sickle-cell ... single representative protects against cholera. ... humanity with valuable gifts of science and technology might, in excess, ... forwards with evidence that this was unproven or unlikely for some ...
    (sci.skeptic)