Re: Stephen J. Gould and anthropological fraud

From: P.Comm (tjsrno_at_spampost.com)
Date: 07/05/04 

Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 06:49:57 GMT

"DesertCactus" <desertcactus@emailcorner.net> wrote in message
news:f25f7f62.0407040826.252fbd88@posting.google.com...
> Adding to what I've posted above.
> I believe Africa and carribbean countries(although they are more
> wealthy because of tourist revenue) will have the largest populations
> in the world.
>
> There are no birth control laws in africa to my knowledge, I mean
> nothing like in China. As I said I expect africa will be the last area
> to catch-up with the rest of the world economically and will therefore
> maintain a large birth rate for the longest period of time.

Here is the problem with Africa - and you'd have to a lot of first hand
reading from FIRST whites that objectively wrote down what they saw there.
You have a stone age people there, they don't even have wheels. No reading.
No writing. None of that. Tribes "as long as th ey can remember" living in
one spot, never even going 10 miles out of there to get to know another
tribe next door. This is hard to imagine for ANYONE in Europe or China. I
mean, didn't they even WALK 10 miles? No - they didn't. They are like
Amazonian Indians are - and you can SEE documentaries of brand new tribes
found there - primitive as ever. In come these industrial aged white men
and they see a LOT of empty land, resources, gold mines to make money, ways
to make money. They think they can just THROW civilization on these
primitive people who have lived their way for god knows HOW long. You know,
you can read about medical attempts to get the natives to wear condoms.
Lord have mercy, you may as well try to teach a DOG how to use one.
Literally. It's useless. It can't be done, you can't just HAND a
civilization that evolved in a whole other place - to people in that
environment. Sure, stuff gets built for them - once the whites are gone, it
falls to ruin. What the hell did anyone EXPECT to happen? If they COULD
have developed that kind of civilization, if they NEEDED to do it (necessity
IS the mother of INVENTION and CHANGE) - IF IF IF, then they WOULD have -
like the Chinese did. Chinese had HUGE civilizations. Why? What for?
Because they DID - in that specific PLACE, in that environment - what they
did naturally - NATURALLY - developed the way it did. Not so in Africa -
which is ANOTHER kind of place. Sure, what do these Africans know? Say the
lord prayer and get food, gimme gimme gimme. Oh, Say something Marxist and
get food - gimme gimme gimme. In comes the medical aid - heaps of people
that would have died off - now they dont die. Heaps of babies that would
have died, now they don't die. Bingo - more people there. Overpopulation?
Yeah? Hello? They manage to APE the WORST tendencies in the white man -
the bossiness, the Big Leader thing - and so they ape it and you get Big
Popa Docs and *** like that, all decked out in trinkets of gold and ***.
Aping Napoleon or whatever. What a SHAM this is. Who the hell knows HOW
Africans would have developed on their own, or even IF they'd have
developed - if NO ONE messed around with them? Again, Amazonian Indians -
what, 5000 years or more they've been there, no one ever saw them, they
never saw anyone else. PRIMITIVE as hell they are. The ones that got
changed by missionaries are living drunken lives of misery - their ENTIRE
way of life has been overturned - and they just DO NOT ADAPT to the new
European ways. Now there is a move to STOP all of that, to try to preserve
these people and leave them alone as ENDANGERED HUMANS. Africans never ever
ADAPTED to the Western democratic model. Russians quickly saw that they are
NOT ready for any kind of Marxism either - they just can not adapt to that
EITHER. Key word: ADAPT. But what they CAN do now, is get gimme gimme
medicine which is just handed to them and overpopulate. Where do they get
the medicine? Did they ever invent any of it - ever? NO. Could they ever
reinvent it if it was no longer given to them? PROBALY NOT. Africa is
doing what you said due to the SAME interference from Europeans. They kill
each other with guns. Did they ever invent gunpowder or guns? NO. Get the
idea now? You have an ALIEN technology and ALIEN ways - shoved onto African
people. They obviously DO NOT ADAPT to it - they don't "become" Europeans
magically able to just invent all this stuff on their own. THIS is part of
the real data that Rushton didn't have the biological or ZOOLOGICAL
training to incorporate into ANYTHING he said. Rushton looking at African
people today, with maladapted alien stuff shoved on them and all that
happened from then on - that's nonsense! You can't objectively look at
people who've been contaminated like that. It's like dolphins, you can't
study a dolphin by observing a trained pet at Sea World. You have to go
into the ocean in the wild to study them. GET IT?

Blacks also, in the USA did not USED TO BE violent destructive losers in the
1950s or 1940s or 1930s or before that - GET IT? They STARTED to get that
way in the 1960s. Blacks as primitive sparcely populated people also were
NOT like they are today in Africa - not at all. The only people I might be
able to say are STILL the same, are some of the Bushmen. Look at them.
Still hunter gatherer, primitive as hell, PEACEFUL TOO. NOT overpopulated
at all.

Do you have any conception of what the whites DID there for so long? I
think you don't.
>
> If we are to look at which races will be most populous in the world in
> the future it will probably be blacks for that reason,

What if no one from the civilized societies HANDED THEM medicine anymore?
Then what? What if no one HANDED THEM food when there is another famine, or
war, or whatever? Then what?

added to the
> fact that the poorer layers of society in richer countries are often
> black, and the poorer layers often have larger families.

Many of the people from Europe that came to the USA were POOR people who had
very large families. They managed to do some very smart things. Imo,
smarter people tend to have less kids because they are interested in
THINGS - they're not so interested in goo gooing and gah gahing with the
children - and not so interested in all that comes with the family thing.
They might think babies are cute, someone else's. But they might not want
one 24/7. Talking to a baby is like talking to a retarded person, they
can't have intellectual mind fun with babies. Like the DINKS - dual income,
no kids - they are usually intellectual people that like pursueing
intellectual things, or going out and enjoying themselves, or they see the
world's a holy mess and do not want to bring a kid into it - they aren't
intersted in changing diapers. Stupider people well, they don't get
interested in THINGS like that. That's my opinion for the trend we see
today. I might be wrong, but I tend to see that these days.
>
> China might have more people than the whole of africa combined but if
> two men are building a house and the Chinese man has a more developed
> structure, with more bricks on it, a head-start, the African man who
> is adding bricks faster will still overtake the Chinese man.

Did Africans ever figure out HOW to make concrete or bricks on their own?
NO. Who would GIVE the Africans bricks? You see, someone else IS giving
them these things, the food for famines, the medicine for illness, the guns,
all of it, even the western style clothing. THEY are inventing NONE of it.
They never did.
>
> I know there are factors like religion but many Africans are Catholic
> for example aswell, and interestingly I believe Italy, a traditionally
> Catholic country has a declining population aswell.

Well, with advanced socieites, as I said, there are MANY pleasure things out
there to be had and done. People would rather have fun than have to take
care of babies.
>
> Also if governments need more younger people if their countries
> population is declining as is the case in Europe and Russia they often
> consider immigration to be a solution, and if all countries are
> declining except africa that's where the immigrants are going to come
> from, actually many illegal african immigrants and immigrants from
> other parts of the world come to europe aswell.

And sure enough, many European countries are having a backlash reaction to
it where they want to kick immigrants like that out. Italy wants to bomb
them if they try to come there. Spain has bobbed wire walls to keep them
out.
>
> So blacks will be the majority of the world's population edventually,
> and that is a sign of a SUCCESSFUL race, heh.

No, it's the sign of a race that is getting by due to the HAND OUTS of
smarter races that are stupid enough to hand anything to them at all. China
will be the next dominant race. I'd bet money on that one. They have the
people - Imagine if they STOP birth controlling? - and they are SMART. THEY
are not accepting immigrants from Africa - NO fucking way, LMAO.
>
> Things like AIDS will come into it, but I still believe that is what
> will happen.

Think about it again. Imagine NO ONE gives them any more hand outs or help.
They don't have the ability to make the stuff on their own.