Re: Stephen J. Gould and anthropological fraud
From: P.Comm (tjsrno_at_spampost.com)
Date: 07/08/04
- Next message: P.Comm: "Re: Stephen J. Gould and anthropological fraud"
- Previous message: Martyn Harrison: "Re: Otzi the Iceman & his axe"
- In reply to: DesertCactus: "Re: Stephen J. Gould and anthropological fraud"
- Next in thread: DesertCactus: "Re: Stephen J. Gould and anthropological fraud"
- Reply: DesertCactus: "Re: Stephen J. Gould and anthropological fraud"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 23:50:35 GMT
"DesertCactus" <desertcactus@emailcorner.net> wrote in message
news:f25f7f62.0407060323.16e3572f@posting.google.com...
> > > If we are to look at which races will be most populous in the world in
> > > the future it will probably be blacks for that reason,
> >
> > What if no one from the civilized societies HANDED THEM medicine
anymore?
> > Then what? What if no one HANDED THEM food when there is another
famine, or
> > war, or whatever? Then what?
>
> The population would decline rapidly. The food given to them by other
> countries isn't just combating a famine. In Ethipoia I believe it is,
> the environment simply cannot support the population that is there,
> there simply shouldn't be that many people living in that particular
> area. When a famine occurs due to natural reasons foreign aid kicks in
> and the population increases even more, the population there is
> actually living on foreign aid food and multiplying it's population.
> The lives of some of the people there seems only to be having many
> children.
What kills me,is that all those dumb*** countries giving them this aid,
definitely DO NOT want heaps of them flocking into their own countries. WHY
don't they just put their guilt in the toilet and flush it - and then STOP
GIVING THEM ANYTHING?
>
> > Did Africans ever figure out HOW to make concrete or bricks on their
own?
> > NO. Who would GIVE the Africans bricks? You see, someone else IS
giving
> > them these things, the food for famines, the medicine for illness, the
guns,
> > all of it, even the western style clothing. THEY are inventing NONE of
it.
> > They never did.
> > >
>
> Let's hope they don't get their hands on nucleur weapons.
Heh, South Africa made sure to dismantle ALL nuclear facilities before black
rule replaced what they had.
>
> > > I know there are factors like religion but many Africans are Catholic
> > > for example aswell, and interestingly I believe Italy, a traditionally
> > > Catholic country has a declining population aswell.
> >
> > Well, with advanced socieites, as I said, there are MANY pleasure things
out
> > there to be had and done. People would rather have fun than have to
take
> > care of babies.
>
> Yes but the fact is using contraception for catholics is a mortal sin.
> They are not allowed to use any unnatural methods of birth control.
> They can space children by using Natural Family Planning, which is
> abstaining during the woman's fertile time, that's all.
Catholics can fess up mortal sins to the Priest and all is OK. LMAO. God
forgives, LOL.
>
> > >
> > > Also if governments need more younger people if their countries
> > > population is declining as is the case in Europe and Russia they often
> > > consider immigration to be a solution, and if all countries are
> > > declining except africa that's where the immigrants are going to come
> > > from, actually many illegal african immigrants and immigrants from
> > > other parts of the world come to europe aswell.
> >
> > And sure enough, many European countries are having a backlash reaction
to
> > it where they want to kick immigrants like that out. Italy wants to
bomb
> > them if they try to come there. Spain has bobbed wire walls to keep them
> > out.
>
> True but still the legal immigrants come. Many African university
> graduates leave their country obviously because they want to live in a
> better place.
Why don't they fix up their own countries?
> As more racial mixing occurs people will be less inclined to oppose
> immigration purely because of the immigrants race.
Depends on what k ind of race mixing. There is more segregation in the USA
now than during Jim Crow days - demographic FACT.
>
> > > So blacks will be the majority of the world's population edventually,
> > > and that is a sign of a SUCCESSFUL race, heh.
> >
> > No, it's the sign of a race that is getting by due to the HAND OUTS of
> > smarter races that are stupid enough to hand anything to them at all.
>
> Exactly. They prosper because of our stupidity, but still they
> prosper, they multiply, we have a declining population, we die out?
> They populate the world? who is more successful?
Well, with some of their countries 80% people have HIV they aren't actually
incresing all that much. You see things in terms of statis quo. Don't you
get the notion that when the *** hits the fan, people DO REACT? History
proves they do!
>
> > China
> > will be the next dominant race. I'd bet money on that one. They have
the
> > people - Imagine if they STOP birth controlling? - and they are SMART.
THEY
> > are not accepting immigrants from Africa - NO fucking way, LMAO.
>
> Don't they accept African students into their universities?
Back then they during Mao and Dong did, and heh, predictable, they had riots
and wanted to kill those students. Chinese tend to think of these Africans
as monkeys - they REALLY are the MOST racist people I ever met in my LIFE.
They way outdo the KKK, seriously. Chinese word for lback -is Ha kwei - it
means "black destructive demon!" That's not similar to their word for
whites. LMAO. Interesting that they also have the idea of destructive.
They must
> allow blacks into their country, to not do so would be racist and
> illegal I believe.
HA - and you really think China cares? Do you know what they DO to Koreans
sneaking into their country? LMAO. TORTURE them, then kick them back out.
Even kill them.
As Asia get's richer, which it is, it will be as
> attractive to the illegal immigrants as Europe currently is. In fact
> not only is intelligence related to an individual's wealth but also
> the intelligence of a countries population is linked to it's wealth.
> Places like Japan, singapore etc have overtaken the USA in GDP I
> believe.
No one is trying to sneak into China if they have strong self preservation
instincts. See above, what the Chinese DO them is pretty bad. And they DO
NOT CARE what "the world" has to say about it. They ignore it. You think
that the whites can morally blackmail the CHINESE? LMAO - oh god man. NO NO
NO.
> I believe Ruston's wrote some stuff about this, 'IQ and the wealth of
> nations' or something. He even has a map with IQ and GDP compared.
>
> > > Things like AIDS will come into it, but I still believe that is what
> > > will happen.
> >
> > Think about it again. Imagine NO ONE gives them any more hand outs or
help.
> > They don't have the ability to make the stuff on their own.
>
> That won't happen though P.Comm. Why would it? Governments are
> encouraged to give I believe it's 1% of their GDP to foreign aid by
> the United Nations. Some give more some give less. Even if governments
> didn't they'll always be charities and religious organisations giving
> help.
Right now. You forget really fast that not so long ago, people didn't even
regard them as human. People are funny - it goes up to a point - and then
OOOOPS - genocide. History man. It's history. You need to grasp that the
forces of the LEFT WING are pretty dead these days, LOL. Most of the Red
leftovers have flocked into the Greens - and what they preach is detrimental
to primitive nations getting more industrial. The pendulum tends to swing.
The 20th century, early on, was the century of pure fascism. Then the left
took over and it swung the other way. Things are kinda getting more right
these days. Again. I think you worry about things you don't have to worry
about! I won't even be ALIVE in 2050, LMAO.
>
> Do you know that it costs 1 dollar a day for the medicines to treat an
> AID infected person, 1 dollar a day doesn't sound like much, but
> multiply it by the amount of people infected in africa only (10's of
> millions) then remember it's per day, and it's a lot of money. Also
> the medicines don't cure AIDS they just prolong life so that the AIDS
> infected can infect more people.
Yes, I know that - PLUS they refuse to quaranteen them. You tell me - are
they TRYING to commit genocide and pretending to help them? You tell me. I
am using logic here. Benign neglect, while pretending to HELP them. That's
what I see - actually exacerbating the problem and making it 1000 times
worse than it was in the early 1980s. That's what I SEE. Are doctors THAT
stupid? I don't think so. I give them more credit than that.
You know that africans rape babies in
> the belief that it will cure them of AIDS?
> AIDS could be erradicated quite easily by simply quarantining the
> infected, difficult in africa where the average AIDS infected per
> country is 35% of the populous I believe, but it would be an effective
> way.
> AIDS is also an emerging problem in India, China and Russia.
I know that. And those countries MIGHT BE quarnateening them or er,
something else more permenent?, there is no way in the world for anyone to
REALLY find out what goes on there. People in India are NOT stupid - they
are above all, very objective and clinical. But Russia and China? Phphph.
Those guys still have secret police there, you know? LOL.
- Next message: P.Comm: "Re: Stephen J. Gould and anthropological fraud"
- Previous message: Martyn Harrison: "Re: Otzi the Iceman & his axe"
- In reply to: DesertCactus: "Re: Stephen J. Gould and anthropological fraud"
- Next in thread: DesertCactus: "Re: Stephen J. Gould and anthropological fraud"
- Reply: DesertCactus: "Re: Stephen J. Gould and anthropological fraud"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]