Re: Could anyone explain this please?

From: DesertCactus (desertcactus_at_emailcorner.net)
Date: 07/11/04 

Date: 11 Jul 2004 09:20:23 -0700

>
> I hold them personally responsible - and so does the whole neo Nazi shebang
> out there that grew due to a REACTION to this "Jewish Black Alliance." That
> a term that Jews themselves write quite a lot about - it's not something I'm
> just saying here. It's CALLED the Jewish Black Alliance. I thought they
> were off their nuts when they did it. The two people can't be MORE unlike
> each other. But when blacks are incited to violence due to this kind of
> movie, or rap lyrics - NO ONE calls it hate crime. Now - what effect to you
> think that has on increased racism? Heh.

Why is that? Why are blacks immune from being recongised as commiting
hate crime? And you said about how if the hate stuff is anti-jewish
then there's a huge uproar? Why is it different?

> Chinese never had black slaves.

Maybe they did no have black 'slaves' but they did capture and take
back a small number of africans to China, correct? What were they used
for?

>
> I don't think make my day is Tom. Make my day posts as himself. He used to
> be Big Don.

Oh ok, well it was from makemyday, anyway.

>
> Slaves were no more tortured or mistreated than the HORSES the plantation
> owners had. They were commodities - and people don't treat their own
> commodities badly - they want them to be as healthy as they want their
> horses to be.

Going back to the movie - Goodbye Uncle Tom, I believe they had
various torture devices, which looked more elaborate and painful than
the medieval torture devices you often read about in history books,
LOL.
AND the film was called a 'historical documentary LMAO, more
deception, they are decieving their target audience, the blacks, to
make it look even worse than it actually was, just to incite that
hatred as much as possible, absolutley disgusting.
>
> YES - as I said, they had it easier than immigrants had it. They had NO
> responsibility - just work, eat, obey. Like horses.

A good system, change doesn't always equal progress, if it ain't broke
don't fix it, they were useful (you wern't paying more to have them
stay in the country than you were getting back through the money they
were earning like now - think about prison costs, welfare etc) and
they are happy, why change it? LOL. (Just joking. - slavery is wrong,
I suppose.)

>
> Everyone knows that. I see them as the one exclusive race of INGRATES - and
> DO NOTHING FOR THEM because NO good deed will go unpunished.

I know it's CRAZY! Whatever you do for them, they have no gratitude at
all, the more they are given the more they point out what they DON'T
have.
Whites died to free them from slavery, what happens - the blacks have
a deep burning hatred for the whites, they make music about how they
want to KILL them.
I wonder what the reason is for them hating the Jews? Because they
helped them?
Money is spent giving medicines to the African countries for AIDS,
what happens, accusations come that the whites created AIDS in the
first place. Honestly what do you have do to please these people?

> > The american whites are as sickened by slavery as the blacks are, in
> > fact probably more so, going back to what we said about the guilt
> > thing.
>
> I think the whites that enslaved that different a race of people were
> utterly INSANE and without foresignt. Then, to compound stupidity with
> COSMIC stupidity, they died to free them (tho the war was ot about that) and
> let them STAY HERE. That was INSANE, utterly INSANE. It was a RECIPE for
> everything we are seeing right now, today. If the slaves had been other
> whites - and then set free -the whole situation would have been MUCH
> different. There wouldn't have been dejure segregation - separate but
> equal, no civil rights movement about BLACKS for purposes of integration -
> when NO ONE wanted real social integration with them. NONE of that woul
> dhave happened if the slaves were also whites - OR if the freed slaves were
> ALL sent back to Africa. INSANITY. All of it. Ambrose Bierce wrote it
> decades ago in The Devil's Dictionary - the definition of Negro: THE
> American Political PROBLEM. You bet.

If they had been white slaves they would have completely been
assmiliated by now, they would have inter-married, and it wouldn't
have been long before you didn't know who was a slave decendant and
who wasn't.
Mixed-marriage was actually illegal for a long time in the USA, so it
was impossible for them to be absorbed into the population, plus they
thought the blacks weren't human for a long time.
Some whites tried to send them back, I can't find the quote, but I
think it was Washington that said, blacks and whites cannot live
together, because of nature, and that the black man can reach his
greatest in his own land of africa, and that he can't do that here, he
said something like that. There were efforts to send them back, but of
course they didn't want to go back, and I think there were over a
million blacks in the USA in 1865, how do you move that many people
when they don't want to go, and you've just given them their freedom?

>
> Yeah, Jews got their good deeds (or anti white Christian deeds, depends on
> how you view the whole thing) shoved down their throats by the NOI. Serves
> them right for stirring up trouble and giving the blacks that kind of CLOUT.
> The entire freaking NAACP used to be ALL JEWISH - not one black face in it.
> They started the damned organization FOR them.

I agree they deserve it. As I said if people died because of these
fucking films it's not a laughing matter.
Well actually the Jews involved with this immoral 'Black-Jewish'
alliance deserve it, not the innocent jews who had nothing to do with
it. I mean a 'Black-Jewish' alliance, exists at the expense of
relations between the other races doesn't it? Otherwise you'd have an
alliance with ALL races, they're excluding non-jews and non-blacks
from the alliance.