Polynesian canoes (Re: Rat genes

From: Yuri Kuchinsky (yuku_at_trends.ca)
Date: 07/25/04 

Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 17:36:42 -0400

benlizross wrote
in article <41041CA5.283B@ihug.co.nz>:
>
> Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
> >
> > benlizross <benlizro@ihug.co.nz> wrote in message news:<4100441E.11F6@ihug.co.nz>...
> > > Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
> >
> > > > I was only asking you to back up some of your claims, but
> > > > perhaps this was asking too much...
> > >
> > > Your demand for "specifics" was a demand to replay several years of
> > > discussion on this group, since you like to pretend that no such
> > > examination of particular points of Heyerdahl's theory has taken place.
> >
> > Yes, some examination did take place.
> >
> > The question is about the results of this examination.
>
> Well, for most people the results could be summed up as: Heyerdahl was
> wrong. But I don't see any point in pursuing a discussion on that level
> of generality.
>
> >
> > > Nobody else is interested in going over all that stuff again. If you
> > > have a particular point which has not been previously discussed, or on
> > > which you have some new evidence, feel free to bring it up.
> > >
> > > Ross Clark
> >
> > You keep making vague allegations about some discredited stuff in
> > Heyerdahl, but you are always short on specifics.
>
> How about a specific example of a vague allegation?
>
> Ross Clark

There's an explicit allegation above, but still
unsubstantiated...

Yuri.

Yuri Kuchinsky -=O=- http://www.trends.ca/~yuku

A great many people think they are thinking when they are
merely rearranging their prejudices -=O=- William James

Relevant Pages