Re: Barrow Boy gibberish...

From: Seppo Renfors (Renfors_at_not.com.au)
Date: 07/26/04 

Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:48:53 GMT

"Floyd L. Davidson" wrote:
>
> Seppo Renfors <Renfors@not.com.au> wrote:
> >"Floyd L. Davidson" wrote:
> >> >> but they are
> >> >> most definitely *not* Inuit, by any definition.
> >>
> >> Hmmm... If you objected above, but not this, then you must
> >> think that the Unangam are not at all related to the Inuit.
> >
> >Simple really - even you INITIALLY said Aleut are not Inuits!! Why the
> >sudden 180 degree about face?
>
> Where is there any about face. I said the Unangam are not
> Inuit. They aren't! I said they are related... and they are!

If they are related, they are the same - and they are not. Further to
that you mouth hollow words without anything to back it up. I want to
see the DNA study you rely on.

Further to that - not only is the above correct but you AGAIN show a
inability to comprehend the language - "related to" appears to have a
secret private meaning to you - one that alters at the drop of a hat
too! Of course ALL people are "related"..... that is the Inuits to the
Bantu... the Aleuts to the Koori... the average Yank to the Afghani
and even to Osama bin Laden!!

> You've posted, in another article, a reference to an article
> where G Horvat presented significant DNA information, all of
> which clearly indicated a high degree of relation between the
> Unangam and Eskimos.

You resort to gibberish again - deliberately to obfuscate your
ignorance. It just doesn't measure up to something one can actually
respond to. Oh and YES I pointed to what YOU claimed "doesn't exist" -
and I have also just finished dealing with another article where you
resorted to outright forgery. I'm not alone to note this tendency of
yours. Eric has had reason to question your integrity as well.

Your words carry no weight anymore. Prove your claims with decent
sources - not misrepresented generalisations from an unrelated
subject/issue.
 
> >> How do you explain the fact that they speak conjugate languages,
> >
> >I suggest you look up the meaning of "conjugate" in a good dictionary
> >- then translate your gibberish to English.
>
> Hee hee, Seppo has a good point there! The word I meant to use
> is "cognate", not "conjugate".
>
> Sorry for the confusion.

If only you would be as honest with the remainder.....

> >> and that there are only three such languages (Unangam, Yupik,
> >> and Inuit). Note that two of the three are Eskimo languages.
> >> You'll have a really difficult time claiming they aren't all
> >> from the same gene pool...
> >
> >That is another load of CROCK! What we see is another nutter claiming
> >the existence of a "language gene"..... what a NUTTER!
>
> Oh, a load of crock eh? Danged. Every linguist who has ever
> looked at the Proto-Eskimo/Aleut language group says it is true
> though! And as noted, G Horvat has posted plenty of DNA
> evidence which all suggested that the linguistic studies are
> correct.

So prove it!

> Unlike the relationship between various Eskimo peoples and the
> branch called Dorset Eskimo, there is a *huge* volume of
> evidence that modern Unangam, Yupik, and Inuit peoples are all
> derived from a single gene pool.

So prove it! You will become famous.... or is it "infamous" going
against DNA and craniometric studies ..... but hey of course you can
PROVE it to be true as you claim.... right here, right now!

> The Unangam are thought to
> have separated about 3-4000 years BP, and the split between
> Yupik and Inuit is thought to have occurred 1-2000 years ago.
> Much of the evidence is derived from linguistics, but
> archaeological studies agree, and more recently DNA studies have
> also added to the list.

...and all you have to do now is prove your cases..... simple
really..... I'd like to see that! 

-- 
SIR - Philosopher unauthorised 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
misled.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Relevant Pages
Quantcast