Re: Affirmitive Action has gone crazy...
From: Floyd L. Davidson (floyd_at_barrow.com)
Date: 07/26/04
- Next message: Floyd L. Davidson: "Re: Question re. Copper artifact CanadianArcticformerRe:CopperCasting In America (Trevelyan)"
- Previous message: Ed Conrad: "Re: Putting data BEFORE theory?"
- In reply to: DesertCactus: "Re: Affirmitive Action has gone crazy..."
- Next in thread: DesertCactus: "Re: Affirmitive Action has gone crazy..."
- Reply: DesertCactus: "Re: Affirmitive Action has gone crazy..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:39:29 -0800
desertcactus@emailcorner.net (DesertCactus) wrote:
>>
>> You'll have to explain to just how you think it will. I can see
>> no possible way for that to happen.
>
>Quite simply when you browse a google group, there are pages with the
If you read news by pointing a web browser at google, you
might well see that. But like I said to start with, it
does it for you... and nobody else. You do realize that
most of us use real news software?
>messages on them, if I bump the threads, they will appear on the first
>page and be more likely to be read,
The *vast* majority of Usenet readers have discovered ways to
make an article they have seen (either if they read it or
decided they didn't want to) disappear *forever*. You can't
make it come back to life by adding another article to the
thread.
If you haven't learned how to do that, you are wasting a huge
amount of time sorting articles that your computer can easily,
in the blink of an eye, manage for you.
>I have noticed how posts on the
>firts page do get replied to more, true some won't get replied to in
>any case if the content isn't worth replying to.
>
>> Perhaps you might not understand that very well either...
>
>Well you're writing huge amounts of text and spending a lot of time
>arguing with me about why I want to bump my personal posts...It's a
>bit odd.
This isn't a huge amount of text. And we are not exactly
arguing about it either. I'm trying to help you learn more
about how it works. (Given the foolishness of most of your
articles, that is probably pointless...)
Whatever, your "bump" messages don't do what you think they do.
-- FloydL. Davidson <http://web.newsguy.com/floyd_davidson> Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd@barrow.com
- Next message: Floyd L. Davidson: "Re: Question re. Copper artifact CanadianArcticformerRe:CopperCasting In America (Trevelyan)"
- Previous message: Ed Conrad: "Re: Putting data BEFORE theory?"
- In reply to: DesertCactus: "Re: Affirmitive Action has gone crazy..."
- Next in thread: DesertCactus: "Re: Affirmitive Action has gone crazy..."
- Reply: DesertCactus: "Re: Affirmitive Action has gone crazy..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|