Re: Feminist kooks dominate anthropology of "male violence"

From: Alfred Einstead (whopkins_at_csd.uwm.edu)
Date: 07/26/04


Date: 26 Jul 2004 06:17:50 -0700


"offshore eddie" <eddie@nospam.com> wrote:
> Who would want to mate with such a violence-loving man?

Apparently, you think everyone should. According to you:

"offshore eddie" <eddie@nospam.com> wrote:
> "Feminist" kooks have not only distorted the perception of the present, they
> are busy distorting perceptions of the past. Here is some of the typical
> "feminist" bull*** that passes for anthropology today:

in direct reply to an anthropolgists' report which stated:
> According to her detailed analysis of the ethnographic record,
> rape of women by men was totally absent or extremely rare
> in 47 percent of the cultures she studied (Sanday, 1981)."

the notion that a society can exist without such acts of violence
as rape is nothing more than the ramblings of a feminist kook
which automatically means that you believe and are claiming the
exact opposite -- that all men are supposedly rapises at heart
-- thereby identifyng yourself to be a "feminist kook".