Re: Feminist kooks dominate anthropology of "male violence"
From: Alfred Einstead (whopkins_at_csd.uwm.edu)
Date: 07/26/04
- Next message: James Michael Howard: "Re: Yet more anthropological explanations for "male violence""
- Previous message: Inger E Johansson: "Re: 'Return Stonehenge' says archdruid"
- In reply to: offshore eddie: "Feminist kooks dominate anthropology of "male violence""
- Next in thread: offshore eddie: "Re: Feminist kooks dominate anthropology of "male violence""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 26 Jul 2004 06:17:50 -0700
"offshore eddie" <eddie@nospam.com> wrote:
> Who would want to mate with such a violence-loving man?
Apparently, you think everyone should. According to you:
"offshore eddie" <eddie@nospam.com> wrote:
> "Feminist" kooks have not only distorted the perception of the present, they
> are busy distorting perceptions of the past. Here is some of the typical
> "feminist" bull*** that passes for anthropology today:
in direct reply to an anthropolgists' report which stated:
> According to her detailed analysis of the ethnographic record,
> rape of women by men was totally absent or extremely rare
> in 47 percent of the cultures she studied (Sanday, 1981)."
the notion that a society can exist without such acts of violence
as rape is nothing more than the ramblings of a feminist kook
which automatically means that you believe and are claiming the
exact opposite -- that all men are supposedly rapises at heart
-- thereby identifyng yourself to be a "feminist kook".
- Next message: James Michael Howard: "Re: Yet more anthropological explanations for "male violence""
- Previous message: Inger E Johansson: "Re: 'Return Stonehenge' says archdruid"
- In reply to: offshore eddie: "Feminist kooks dominate anthropology of "male violence""
- Next in thread: offshore eddie: "Re: Feminist kooks dominate anthropology of "male violence""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]