Re: Polymorphism in genomics Re: subtract orangutan genome from chimpanzee genome to gain Throwing genes

From: Ray Audette (rso456_at_airmail.net)
Date: 07/28/04 

Date: 27 Jul 2004 23:44:41 -0700

Archimedes Plutonium <a_plutonium@iw.net> wrote in message
> Well, you have to be able to distinguish in an environment, which is the >driving force for change in a species. In this case it is simple to distinguish.
>
> On one side with have a new behaviour some 10 million years ago of Stone and Rock throwing.
> On the other side, Ray claims importance to brain shape and left and right
> hemisphere.

A skull shape that began with Hominids 10 million years ago.

>
> I say easy, because, well, can brain shape force into existence Stone >throwing or drive throwing to various degrees of proficiency? No, of course >not.
> But can Stone throwing create and drive brain geometry? And here the answer is
> resoundingly yes.

This is "which came first, the chicken or the egg" argument. Talk
about silliness!

> So, once we get DNA or genomics evidence that shows human DNA is different >from chimpanzee and orangutan and gorilla DNA because human DNA is coded for >*superior throwing behaviour*.

And I suppose we'll get the DNA from pre-human Hominids from coal. The
DNA for a longitudinaly asymetric brain will produce *superior aiming
behavior*. We know they had that. Please read my references - many of
them pertain to fields of interest that you expound about on your
website ( I wish my computer was new enough to view your home-made
movies, I used to love making 8mm films when I was your age).

Ray Audette
Author "NeanderThin"
www.NeanderThin.com